View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kellylen The Order of Denderah
Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Posts: 2823 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TOSG wrote: | kellylen wrote: | well if the strand enters the blood straight it will get killed. so doesnt it need a medium to help it enter?
it would also need to enter cell nuclei in order to work on the DNA and RNA synthesis. so maybe something in the solution can help it do that. |
Sure, it needs some kind of medium, but epogen is a hormone, not a buffer or vector.
And:
1) Red blood cells don't have nuclei.
2) Ribozymes are not generally located in the nucleus (at least not exclusively). So, there's no reason to assume that the strand needs to enter the nucleus. Just think of it as a macromolecular inhibitor, acting on a ribozyme that is probably cytoplasmic (or membrane bound?). |
ok you got me on that one. but maybe it takes the thing somewhere?!?1 i dunno. _________________ -Kelly |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marlasinger Devoted Fan
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 736 Location: The 8th Dimension
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
unless a simple symptom of becoming trait negative includes low blood count, and epogen is the solution...? _________________ my love tastes a lot like tofu.
The Bree Solution.
http://one.revver.com/watch/330795
"Also... im in ur canons... supporting all ur marlas."
-AutoPilate |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aponi Devoted Fan
Joined: 26 Apr 2007 Posts: 545 Location: New York
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Who even knows.
DB need to do some b&e on the Order and steal more super secret documents to find this out.
And we need to get Bree back to even procede with any of this.
OOG: I don't think the Creators would have shown us Epogen if it wasn't important. I think it is, somehow. Just have no clue how at this point. _________________ The names Julie.
Bree and Jonas Forever! <3
Grand Master of Praise of the SSJF but Shhh about it 'k? XD
My LG15 Vid |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kellylen The Order of Denderah
Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Posts: 2823 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marla epogen raises rbc count not lowers it _________________ -Kelly |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marlasinger Devoted Fan
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 736 Location: The 8th Dimension
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that's what im saying kelly - that a SIDE EFFECT of becoming trait negative is LOW blood count, and that epogen is the SOLUTION to that by RAISING blood count. _________________ my love tastes a lot like tofu.
The Bree Solution.
http://one.revver.com/watch/330795
"Also... im in ur canons... supporting all ur marlas."
-AutoPilate |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kellylen The Order of Denderah
Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Posts: 2823 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
are you sure thats a side effect marla? _________________ -Kelly |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marlasinger Devoted Fan
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 736 Location: The 8th Dimension
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no, it was proposing it - to explain epogen. hence the ?mark at the end of my sentence.
I have NO idea how that would happen, to be honest. But at this point, guessing which ribozymes and what side effects would be possible. To postulate that Bree would experience a low blood count because of a inactivated ribozyme really doesn't make much sense...bone marrow? _________________ my love tastes a lot like tofu.
The Bree Solution.
http://one.revver.com/watch/330795
"Also... im in ur canons... supporting all ur marlas."
-AutoPilate |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kellylen The Order of Denderah
Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Posts: 2823 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ohh alright i understand now. _________________ -Kelly |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anniid Lonely Fan
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 241 Location: A snowflake
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Given the interpretation that Given Fact #4 says “this portion (the active strand) still functions, but you cannot block it because the complementary strand won’t copy,” this makes perfect sense. Without the complementary strand to “occlude the activity” of the active strand (Theoretical Solution #3), Bree’s ribozyme remains active. |
This doesn't make sense to me. How can you use the theoretical solution to describe what makes bree different?
That is the part that throws this off for me. _________________ One day you'll know who I am. On that day, so will everyone else.
Acting president of the Jonas is Sexy Fan Club!
Member of the Sarah Fan Club and the Daniel-Sarah Romance Promotion Force. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marlasinger Devoted Fan
Joined: 27 Feb 2007 Posts: 736 Location: The 8th Dimension
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't get what you...don't get. We're using Theoretical Solution #3 as...a solution, not an explanation for how Bree is different.
#3 states that
Quote: |
3) Q.E.D. strand will bind to ribozyme and occlude its copy
|
and we're using that to back up the theory that we need the complementary strand to occlude the active strand.
err, i'm making a video. it might make more sense after that? _________________ my love tastes a lot like tofu.
The Bree Solution.
http://one.revver.com/watch/330795
"Also... im in ur canons... supporting all ur marlas."
-AutoPilate
Last edited by marlasinger on Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TOSG Devoted Fan
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 651
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
anniid wrote: | Quote: | Given the interpretation that Given Fact #4 says “this portion (the active strand) still functions, but you cannot block it because the complementary strand won’t copy,” this makes perfect sense. Without the complementary strand to “occlude the activity” of the active strand (Theoretical Solution #3), Bree’s ribozyme remains active. |
This doesn't make sense to me. How can you use the theoretical solution to describe what makes bree different?
That is the part that throws this off for me. |
I don't quite get what you don't get. "Theoretical Solution #3" is just citing a part of Isaac Gilman's document, not my own theory. Dr. Gilman's theoretical solution was made in the context of his knowledge of the state of Bree's ribozymes. _________________ I'm canon; the Creators just don't know it yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
anniid Lonely Fan
Joined: 08 Dec 2006 Posts: 241 Location: A snowflake
|
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marlasinger wrote: | I don't get what you...don't get. We're using Theoretical Solution #3 as...a solution, not an explanation for how Bree is different.
#3 states that
Quote: |
3) Q.E.D. strand will bind to ribozyme and occlude its copy
|
and we're using that to back up the theory that we need the complementary strand to occlude the active strand.
err, i'm making a video. it might make more sense after that? |
Opps! I get it now.
Sorry I am an auditory learner, and dyslexic... So I was just confused about what it said.
Thanks though!
This is a good theory now that I understand what it says. _________________ One day you'll know who I am. On that day, so will everyone else.
Acting president of the Jonas is Sexy Fan Club!
Member of the Sarah Fan Club and the Daniel-Sarah Romance Promotion Force. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TOSG Devoted Fan
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 651
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Check out the video that Marla made, presenting this theory much more coherently
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaCMKEVh1HY _________________ I'm canon; the Creators just don't know it yet. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kellylen The Order of Denderah
Joined: 21 Nov 2006 Posts: 2823 Location: New Jersey
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marla is fucking sexy _________________ -Kelly |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BrightSilence Devoted Fan
Joined: 23 May 2007 Posts: 619 Location: the Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another lovely vid by marla. That really did help. I don't like to read all this stuff, you guys talk about it like it's common knowledge but it doesn't make any sense to me at all. The video cleared alot of that up...
By the way, was all of this in the 'wet' document? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|