Talk:Brookers - Revision history

Zoey: /* Deletion */

2007-05-20T03:08:03Z

‎Deletion

OwenIsCool at 17:01, 24 April 2007

2007-04-24T17:01:50Z

Jonpro: Deletion

2007-04-24T15:49:45Z

Deletion

Phuncknasty: we could make the article at vlog maybe?

2007-02-26T02:35:32Z

we could make the article at vlog maybe?

OwenIsCool at 01:51, 2 February 2007

2007-02-02T01:51:15Z

LordGreystoke422: I make some new article suggestions.

2007-02-02T01:04:35Z

I make some new article suggestions.

Terryfic: /* Relevance */

2007-02-02T00:54:02Z

‎Relevance

LordGreystoke422 at 00:43, 2 February 2007

2007-02-02T00:43:15Z

71.224.243.78 at 00:36, 2 February 2007

2007-02-02T00:36:23Z

OwenIsCool at 00:18, 2 February 2007

2007-02-02T00:18:29Z

New page

==Relevance==
What's the relation between this and LG15? I've never heard of Brookers before... is there a fanfic vid or something? [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 18:18, 1 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:08, 20 May 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:
	This page has been marked for deletion for a while and it doesn't look like any consensus has been reached. Personally I'd vote for delete because the information here is minimal and the connection to lonelygirl15 is sketchy at best. Other thoughts?--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 10:49, 24 April 2007 (CDT)		This page has been marked for deletion for a while and it doesn't look like any consensus has been reached. Personally I'd vote for delete because the information here is minimal and the connection to lonelygirl15 is sketchy at best. Other thoughts?--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 10:49, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
	:Yeah, it doesn't look like we'd lose that much info if we deleted. I think that the article described in the discussion above is a good idea, but we don't have to wait for that to get written. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 12:01, 24 April 2007 (CDT)		:Yeah, it doesn't look like we'd lose that much info if we deleted. I think that the article described in the discussion above is a good idea, but we don't have to wait for that to get written. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 12:01, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	If no one objects before then, I will delete in 24 hours. --[[User:Zoey\|Zoey]] 22:08, 19 May 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 24 April 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:

	This page has been marked for deletion for a while and it doesn't look like any consensus has been reached. Personally I'd vote for delete because the information here is minimal and the connection to lonelygirl15 is sketchy at best. Other thoughts?--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 10:49, 24 April 2007 (CDT)		This page has been marked for deletion for a while and it doesn't look like any consensus has been reached. Personally I'd vote for delete because the information here is minimal and the connection to lonelygirl15 is sketchy at best. Other thoughts?--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 10:49, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
		+	:Yeah, it doesn't look like we'd lose that much info if we deleted. I think that the article described in the discussion above is a good idea, but we don't have to wait for that to get written. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 12:01, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:49, 24 April 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:

	::::::{{User:Phuncknasty/sig}} 20:35, 25 February 2007 (CST)		::::::{{User:Phuncknasty/sig}} 20:35, 25 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	== Deletion ==
		+
		+	This page has been marked for deletion for a while and it doesn't look like any consensus has been reached. Personally I'd vote for delete because the information here is minimal and the connection to lonelygirl15 is sketchy at best. Other thoughts?--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 10:49, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 26 February 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:::::Hey, that'd be an interesting article to have if you could put it together. Maybe it could be about the strategies the creators used to get attention on YouTube (subscribing to lots of channels, replying to popular vids, putting tags of other bloggers and stuff), and then you could explain some of those tags, like Renetto, thewinekone, etc. Otherwise I think these bloggers might fall into the [[Other fanfic]] article, and they could have their own section, like "Famous Bloggers who responded to LG15" or something. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 19:51, 1 February 2007 (CST)		:::::Hey, that'd be an interesting article to have if you could put it together. Maybe it could be about the strategies the creators used to get attention on YouTube (subscribing to lots of channels, replying to popular vids, putting tags of other bloggers and stuff), and then you could explain some of those tags, like Renetto, thewinekone, etc. Otherwise I think these bloggers might fall into the [[Other fanfic]] article, and they could have their own section, like "Famous Bloggers who responded to LG15" or something. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 19:51, 1 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::::::Looks like we have the start of that at [[vlog]]. A lot of the wanted pages (like [[Filthywhore]]) could redirect to vlog too. I think it could be a good article. Looking at what influenced the vlog style.
		+
		+	::::::{{User:Phuncknasty/sig}} 20:35, 25 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:51, 2 February 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	::::Ahhh yes..she did mention brookers in a tag to get hits didn't she? Anyway..I was going to make a somewhat similar proposal for a page of Popular Youtubers mentioning LG15. I know there was Renetto, Winekone and Thehill88(I think she may have made actual response vids.). Brookers actually doesnt make my list as far as I know. I think my proposal should have enough data to work with to make a decent page..don't know till we try. As to the Famous Tags page...maybe that could be part of an article on the launching of a YouTube Icon...along with some other things the creators did to get LG15 noticed before her first actual Vlog. Oh..and having checked brookers vids slightly..I am more for deletion of this page. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 19:04, 1 February 2007 (CST)		::::Ahhh yes..she did mention brookers in a tag to get hits didn't she? Anyway..I was going to make a somewhat similar proposal for a page of Popular Youtubers mentioning LG15. I know there was Renetto, Winekone and Thehill88(I think she may have made actual response vids.). Brookers actually doesnt make my list as far as I know. I think my proposal should have enough data to work with to make a decent page..don't know till we try. As to the Famous Tags page...maybe that could be part of an article on the launching of a YouTube Icon...along with some other things the creators did to get LG15 noticed before her first actual Vlog. Oh..and having checked brookers vids slightly..I am more for deletion of this page. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 19:04, 1 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:::::Hey, that'd be an interesting article to have if you could put it together. Maybe it could be about the strategies the creators used to get attention on YouTube (subscribing to lots of channels, replying to popular vids, putting tags of other bloggers and stuff), and then you could explain some of those tags, like Renetto, thewinekone, etc. Otherwise I think these bloggers might fall into the [[Other fanfic]] article, and they could have their own section, like "Famous Bloggers who responded to LG15" or something. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 19:51, 1 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:04, 2 February 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:::I can't see any reason why she in particular should have her own page. Perhaps we should make a single page that lists all the 'famous' YouTubers that LG included in her tags for her first few videos.[[User:Terryfic\|Terryfic]] 18:54, 1 February 2007 (CST)		:::I can't see any reason why she in particular should have her own page. Perhaps we should make a single page that lists all the 'famous' YouTubers that LG included in her tags for her first few videos.[[User:Terryfic\|Terryfic]] 18:54, 1 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+
		+	::::Ahhh yes..she did mention brookers in a tag to get hits didn't she? Anyway..I was going to make a somewhat similar proposal for a page of Popular Youtubers mentioning LG15. I know there was Renetto, Winekone and Thehill88(I think she may have made actual response vids.). Brookers actually doesnt make my list as far as I know. I think my proposal should have enough data to work with to make a decent page..don't know till we try. As to the Famous Tags page...maybe that could be part of an article on the launching of a YouTube Icon...along with some other things the creators did to get LG15 noticed before her first actual Vlog. Oh..and having checked brookers vids slightly..I am more for deletion of this page. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 19:04, 1 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:54, 2 February 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	::You know me about fanfic and pages..as far as I know..she aint.. I think the ONLY connection is Daniel is subscribed to her? Ummm..just looked..nope..he has 5 subscriptions and the one I was thinkin of was Karleybobarly...not that Beast subbin her was a reason..so. I see no reason to keep her...gonna check her vids to make sure she hasnt done any LG15 commentary etc...but I say Delete. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 18:43, 1 February 2007 (CST)		::You know me about fanfic and pages..as far as I know..she aint.. I think the ONLY connection is Daniel is subscribed to her? Ummm..just looked..nope..he has 5 subscriptions and the one I was thinkin of was Karleybobarly...not that Beast subbin her was a reason..so. I see no reason to keep her...gonna check her vids to make sure she hasnt done any LG15 commentary etc...but I say Delete. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 18:43, 1 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:::I can't see any reason why she in particular should have her own page. Perhaps we should make a single page that lists all the 'famous' YouTubers that LG included in her tags for her first few videos.[[User:Terryfic\|Terryfic]] 18:54, 1 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:43, 2 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:

	:She was the queen of youtube before Bree, but I see no reason for her to have a page.		:She was the queen of youtube before Bree, but I see no reason for her to have a page.
		+
		+	::You know me about fanfic and pages..as far as I know..she aint.. I think the ONLY connection is Daniel is subscribed to her? Ummm..just looked..nope..he has 5 subscriptions and the one I was thinkin of was Karleybobarly...not that Beast subbin her was a reason..so. I see no reason to keep her...gonna check her vids to make sure she hasnt done any LG15 commentary etc...but I say Delete. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 18:43, 1 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:36, 2 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Relevance==		==Relevance==
	What's the relation between this and LG15? I've never heard of Brookers before... is there a fanfic vid or something? [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 18:18, 1 February 2007 (CST)		What's the relation between this and LG15? I've never heard of Brookers before... is there a fanfic vid or something? [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 18:18, 1 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:She was the queen of youtube before Bree, but I see no reason for her to have a page.