Talk:Lying Bastards - Revision history

Renegade: /* proposed compromise */

2007-04-09T14:34:56Z

‎proposed compromise

Misty: /* proposed compromise */

2007-04-09T06:23:49Z

‎proposed compromise

Renegade: /* proposed compromise */

2007-04-09T01:51:08Z

‎proposed compromise

Misty: /* proposed compromise */

2007-04-09T01:04:04Z

‎proposed compromise

Misty at 01:01, 9 April 2007

2007-04-09T01:01:23Z

Renegade: /* proposed compromise */

2007-04-09T00:22:49Z

‎proposed compromise

JayHenry: proposed compromise

2007-04-08T16:26:30Z

proposed compromise

Renegade: /* Image caption */ Did I mention this "OMFG YOU DIDN'T ENTER A SUMMARY!!!!" stuff annoys me?

2007-04-08T11:12:27Z

‎Image caption: Did I mention this "OMFG YOU DIDN'T ENTER A SUMMARY!!!!" stuff annoys me?

Misty at 05:22, 8 April 2007

2007-04-08T05:22:12Z

Misty: /* Image caption */

2007-04-08T05:18:05Z

‎Image caption

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:34, 9 April 2007
Line 65:		Line 65:
	::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 20:51, 8 April 2007 (CDT)		::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 20:51, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
	:::::I don't have any hostility toward, you are just making me laugh. I actually like you and I appreciate you, and your contributions a lot. But in this case there is a joke that you are clueless to (just like Bree was clueless to the put the ho in mexico joke): and that joke is that Bree was clueless. So we get to laugh at Bree for being clueless about it, and because you were clueless, about the joke being that Bree was clueless, I got to laugh at that too. But please don't take it personally, there are alot of times that I'm the clueless one, so I hope that you can laugh along with the rest of us, like I do when the joke is on me. -[[User:Misty\|Misty]] 01:23, 9 April 2007 (CDT)		:::::I don't have any hostility toward, you are just making me laugh. I actually like you and I appreciate you, and your contributions a lot. But in this case there is a joke that you are clueless to (just like Bree was clueless to the put the ho in mexico joke): and that joke is that Bree was clueless. So we get to laugh at Bree for being clueless about it, and because you were clueless, about the joke being that Bree was clueless, I got to laugh at that too. But please don't take it personally, there are alot of times that I'm the clueless one, so I hope that you can laugh along with the rest of us, like I do when the joke is on me. -[[User:Misty\|Misty]] 01:23, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
		+	::::::Congratulations. You successfully confused the hell out of me...-_^
		+	::::::Or, put differently: I am clueless about what I'm clueless about.
		+	::::::<small>Sidenote: Misty seems nice...Misty seems evil...Misty turns out nice after all - are you sure you're not scripted by The Creators?</small>
		+	:::::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 09:34, 9 April 2007 (CDT)
		+	:::::::P.S.: This episode is rapidly falling out of currentness. Let's just take the compromise and go with it - there's already a new caption war on. (An Eastside/Westside one, too!)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:23, 9 April 2007
Line 64:		Line 64:
	:::I do have this feeling Misty's showing a certain hostility towards me...		:::I do have this feeling Misty's showing a certain hostility towards me...
	::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 20:51, 8 April 2007 (CDT)		::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 20:51, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
		+	:::::I don't have any hostility toward, you are just making me laugh. I actually like you and I appreciate you, and your contributions a lot. But in this case there is a joke that you are clueless to (just like Bree was clueless to the put the ho in mexico joke): and that joke is that Bree was clueless. So we get to laugh at Bree for being clueless about it, and because you were clueless, about the joke being that Bree was clueless, I got to laugh at that too. But please don't take it personally, there are alot of times that I'm the clueless one, so I hope that you can laugh along with the rest of us, like I do when the joke is on me. -[[User:Misty\|Misty]] 01:23, 9 April 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 :Hrmpf...it's better, but still not as funny as some of the captions with an actual punchline.
 ::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 19:22, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
 :: ROFLMFAO!!!!  Having a caption of "Theres no 'Ho' in mexico", is exactly the same joke, as we would have, if this discussion were the video, and it had picture of Renagade, with the caption of "It doesn't have punchline".  _[[User:Misty|Misty]] 20:01, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 :Hrmpf...it's better, but still not as funny as some of the captions with an actual punchline.
 ::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 19:22, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
-:: ROFLMFAO!!!!  Having a caption of "Theres no 'Ho' in mexico", is exactly the same joke, as we would have, if this discussion were the video, and it had picture of Renagade, with the caption of "We need a punchline".  _[[User:Misty|Misty]] 20:01, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
+:: ROFLMFAO!!!!  Having a caption of "Theres no 'Ho' in mexico", is exactly the same joke, as we would have, if this discussion were the video, and it had picture of Renagade, with the caption of "It doesn't have punchline".  _[[User:Misty|Misty]] 20:01, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:01, 9 April 2007
Line 60:		Line 60:
	:Hrmpf...it's better, but still not as funny as some of the captions with an actual punchline.		:Hrmpf...it's better, but still not as funny as some of the captions with an actual punchline.
	::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 19:22, 8 April 2007 (CDT)		::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 19:22, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
		+	:: ROFLMFAO!!!! Having a caption of "Theres no 'Ho' in mexico", is exactly the same joke, as we would have, if this discussion were the video, and it had picture of Renagade, with the caption of "We need a punchline". _[[User:Misty\|Misty]] 20:01, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 9 April 2007
Line 58:		Line 58:

	How about "There's no 'ho' in Mexico?" With the question mark. It's subtle for those who prefer subtletly, bit I think it also adheres to Renegade's opinions about what constitutes a good joke. I thought before that the picture was clearly the punchline, but I think that it's even more explicit now. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 11:26, 8 April 2007 (CDT)		How about "There's no 'ho' in Mexico?" With the question mark. It's subtle for those who prefer subtletly, bit I think it also adheres to Renegade's opinions about what constitutes a good joke. I thought before that the picture was clearly the punchline, but I think that it's even more explicit now. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 11:26, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
		+	:Hrmpf...it's better, but still not as funny as some of the captions with an actual punchline.
		+	::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 19:22, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 8 April 2007
Line 54:		Line 54:
	::::::If you can do something subtle with a quote, be my guest. But there's nothing subtlely funny about "There's no 'ho' in Mexico". On its own, it's just a boring, true statement - which is exactly the reason it needs a punchline. To de-bore it. (What the hell is there to "figure out" anyway? The quote says everything necessary - instantly killing all humor and subtlety.)		::::::If you can do something subtle with a quote, be my guest. But there's nothing subtlely funny about "There's no 'ho' in Mexico". On its own, it's just a boring, true statement - which is exactly the reason it needs a punchline. To de-bore it. (What the hell is there to "figure out" anyway? The quote says everything necessary - instantly killing all humor and subtlety.)
	:::::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 06:12, 8 April 2007 (CDT)		:::::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 06:12, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	== proposed compromise ==
		+
		+	How about "There's no 'ho' in Mexico?" With the question mark. It's subtle for those who prefer subtletly, bit I think it also adheres to Renegade's opinions about what constitutes a good joke. I thought before that the picture was clearly the punchline, but I think that it's even more explicit now. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 11:26, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:12, 8 April 2007
Line 52:		Line 52:
	::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 22:11, 7 April 2007 (CDT)		::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 22:11, 7 April 2007 (CDT)
	::::: Renegade saying it needs a punch-line is like saying no one can can figure it out for themselves. Like I said before, the beauty is in the subtlety. give the viewers some credit. -[[User:Misty\|Misty]] 00:18, 8 April 2007 (CDT)		::::: Renegade saying it needs a punch-line is like saying no one can can figure it out for themselves. Like I said before, the beauty is in the subtlety. give the viewers some credit. -[[User:Misty\|Misty]] 00:18, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
		+	::::::If you can do something subtle with a quote, be my guest. But there's nothing subtlely funny about "There's no 'ho' in Mexico". On its own, it's just a boring, true statement - which is exactly the reason it needs a punchline. To de-bore it. (What the hell is there to "figure out" anyway? The quote says everything necessary - instantly killing all humor and subtlety.)
		+	:::::::~ [[User:Renegade\|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade\|talk]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Renegade\|contribs]]) 06:12, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 ::::Anyway, I stand by what I said before. I think just "There's no 'ho' in Mexico." is not enough. It misses a joke. A punchline.
 :::::~ [[User:Renegade|Renegade]] ([[User talk:Renegade|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Renegade|contribs]]) 20:52, 7 April 2007 (CDT)
-::::: Why are you shocked at me saying "eat my pussy", I've had my share of fish tacos :P -[[User:Misty|Misty]] 00:18, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
+:18, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
 ::Since when does there need to be a joke or punchline for the quote? "Spring Break Sucks" says "tend and befriend"... I really see no point in having the "You boys want my fish taco" as the quote. It's just silly. [[User:Chelseyrl|Chelseyrl]] 21:14, 7 April 2007 (CDT)
 :::I don't advocate "You boys want my fish taco", so your dislike of that quote is kind of immaterial to my quest to preserve the humor of the episode in the image caption. Whether you like it or not, dirty jokes, disguised or not, were the central theme of this episode. And just like "Spring Break Sucks" has its central theme, "tend and befriend" as its caption, this episode needs a caption that reflects its humor and mood. "There is no 'ho' in Mexico" does not fulfill this condition, because it lacks a punchline - leaving it as nothing but a factual statement that is about as much worth as having "Purple Monkey is purple" for a P.Monkey centered episode.