Talk:Uncle Dan - Revision history

Psmith: format

2007-03-25T00:04:31Z

format

Skeeta at 07:18, 19 March 2007

2007-03-19T07:18:52Z

Jonpro at 18:01, 16 March 2007

2007-03-16T18:01:29Z

Brucker: /* Cast and character pages */ Definition of "cameo"

2007-03-16T16:45:37Z

‎Cast and character pages: Definition of "cameo"

OwenIsCool: just my 0.02

2007-03-16T00:00:55Z

just my 0.02

Skeeta at 23:51, 15 March 2007

2007-03-15T23:51:28Z

Brucker: /* Cast and character pages */

2007-03-15T23:21:26Z

‎Cast and character pages

JayHenry: /* Cast and character pages */

2007-03-15T21:57:02Z

‎Cast and character pages

Jonpro: /* Cast and character pages */

2007-03-15T21:51:26Z

‎Cast and character pages

JayHenry: /* Cast and character pages */

2007-03-15T21:40:17Z

‎Cast and character pages

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <center>
 {| align=center style="width:375px" border=2 border-color=#2574C4
@@ Line 20: / Line 9: @@
 [[User:Psmith|Psmith]] 20:27, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
 </center>
 That. Was. Bizarre. <span style="color:Blue">'''''-BRUCKER [[Image:EyeBlueSmall.jpg]] ([[User:Brucker|Home]]/[[User talk:Brucker|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Brucker|Contribs]])'''''</span> 19:53, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
 :NO. KIDDING. BUT I loved it!!  Question to veteran fans: Was that "Musician" that one vocalist from that band Dee who did that "What have you done, Lonelygirl?" song??  Here's the video on YouTube if you aren't sure what I'm talking about [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fc1LL5if2kM] --[[User:Phoenician|Phoenician]]
 == Cast ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:18, 19 March 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	::Ehh, if I was really angry at my drunk, secret-info-spilling, hooking-up-with-my-aunt "friend", I would have been more concerned with getting him out of there. Anyway, he seemed pissed and hardly in the mood for a drunken tryst with one of his aunt's friends. Maybe she's not his type. I'm not putting this forward as anything definite, but I think that [[Interrogation 101]] showed that Jonas might like Bree (well, before she abused him). He accuses Daniel of setting him up so he could "have Bree all to himself". That's a pretty bold accusation to make for someone who wouldn't have been interested in Bree in the first place. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 19:00, 15 March 2007 (CDT)		::Ehh, if I was really angry at my drunk, secret-info-spilling, hooking-up-with-my-aunt "friend", I would have been more concerned with getting him out of there. Anyway, he seemed pissed and hardly in the mood for a drunken tryst with one of his aunt's friends. Maybe she's not his type. I'm not putting this forward as anything definite, but I think that [[Interrogation 101]] showed that Jonas might like Bree (well, before she abused him). He accuses Daniel of setting him up so he could "have Bree all to himself". That's a pretty bold accusation to make for someone who wouldn't have been interested in Bree in the first place. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 19:00, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	:::no, i disagree. daniel had openly accused jonas of trying to get bree, so that would be a rational accusation to make - he said before that he wasn't interested in bree, but aparently he thought daniel might not be convinced.--[[User:Skeeta\|Skeeta]] 02:18, 19 March 2007 (CDT)

	<center>		<center>

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 16 March 2007
Line 75:		Line 75:

	:::::Okay, I'm feeling a bit prophetic today. Did I say "curveball"? I just somehow knew that any definition of "cameo" I threw up yesterday wouldn't survive the week. Turned out it wasn't destined to survive the rest of the day... <span style="color:Blue">'''''-BRUCKER [[Image:EyeBlueSmall.jpg]] ([[User:Brucker\|Home]]/[[User talk:Brucker\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Brucker\|Contribs]])'''''</span> 11:45, 16 March 2007 (CDT)		:::::Okay, I'm feeling a bit prophetic today. Did I say "curveball"? I just somehow knew that any definition of "cameo" I threw up yesterday wouldn't survive the week. Turned out it wasn't destined to survive the rest of the day... <span style="color:Blue">'''''-BRUCKER [[Image:EyeBlueSmall.jpg]] ([[User:Brucker\|Home]]/[[User talk:Brucker\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Brucker\|Contribs]])'''''</span> 11:45, 16 March 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	::::::It's like the creators are trying to make life difficult for us. The way I see it, the people at the party can still be kept on the cameo page unless some of them start appearing in more videos. I know a nice definition of a "cameo" would be nice, but anytime we come up with a nice definition, it gets shattered. Maybe we can't have a hard-fast rule for everything, and we just need to use our judgment (and discussion) to figure out what's best.--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 13:01, 16 March 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 16 March 2007
Line 73:		Line 73:

	::::There should be no problem with any of that, you just need to use the "!" template in some cases. Regarding all of this, before the next video comes up and it has to be resolved for some reason that the creators no doubt throw us another curveball: what is our definition of a "cameo" in this case? Appearing in only one video is not enough, as that applies to Bree's mom. Perhaps if they appear in only one video, and have no major importance to the plot as a whole? That would include "Random Girl" and "The Cowboy", I think. <span style="color:Blue">'''''-BRUCKER [[Image:EyeBlueSmall.jpg]] ([[User:Brucker\|Home]]/[[User talk:Brucker\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Brucker\|Contribs]])'''''</span> 18:21, 15 March 2007 (CDT)		::::There should be no problem with any of that, you just need to use the "!" template in some cases. Regarding all of this, before the next video comes up and it has to be resolved for some reason that the creators no doubt throw us another curveball: what is our definition of a "cameo" in this case? Appearing in only one video is not enough, as that applies to Bree's mom. Perhaps if they appear in only one video, and have no major importance to the plot as a whole? That would include "Random Girl" and "The Cowboy", I think. <span style="color:Blue">'''''-BRUCKER [[Image:EyeBlueSmall.jpg]] ([[User:Brucker\|Home]]/[[User talk:Brucker\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Brucker\|Contribs]])'''''</span> 18:21, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	:::::Okay, I'm feeling a bit prophetic today. Did I say "curveball"? I just somehow knew that any definition of "cameo" I threw up yesterday wouldn't survive the week. Turned out it wasn't destined to survive the rest of the day... <span style="color:Blue">'''''-BRUCKER [[Image:EyeBlueSmall.jpg]] ([[User:Brucker\|Home]]/[[User talk:Brucker\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Brucker\|Contribs]])'''''</span> 11:45, 16 March 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:00, 16 March 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:that girl was really coming on to him, and he just seemed disinterested. though maybe it was just cuz he was distracted by daniel and alex. a lot of ppl think he's gay, anyway.--[[User:Skeeta\|Skeeta]] 18:51, 15 March 2007 (CDT)		:that girl was really coming on to him, and he just seemed disinterested. though maybe it was just cuz he was distracted by daniel and alex. a lot of ppl think he's gay, anyway.--[[User:Skeeta\|Skeeta]] 18:51, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	::Ehh, if I was really angry at my drunk, secret-info-spilling, hooking-up-with-my-aunt "friend", I would have been more concerned with getting him out of there. Anyway, he seemed pissed and hardly in the mood for a drunken tryst with one of his aunt's friends. Maybe she's not his type. I'm not putting this forward as anything definite, but I think that [[Interrogation 101]] showed that Jonas might like Bree (well, before she abused him). He accuses Daniel of setting him up so he could "have Bree all to himself". That's a pretty bold accusation to make for someone who wouldn't have been interested in Bree in the first place. [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 19:00, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

	<center>		<center>

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 15 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:

	How is jonas gay o_o --[[User:Michiev\|Michiev]]		How is jonas gay o_o --[[User:Michiev\|Michiev]]
		+
		+	:that girl was really coming on to him, and he just seemed disinterested. though maybe it was just cuz he was distracted by daniel and alex. a lot of ppl think he's gay, anyway.--[[User:Skeeta\|Skeeta]] 18:51, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

	<center>		<center>

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:21, 15 March 2007
Line 67:		Line 67:

	::: Brucker, can we use piped links in the vidchar template? If so, we can have them direct to their exact section of the piped links page. Unfortunately, I think redirects can only take you to the article, not a particular section. Yeah, I think all the filmography categories of people with only one minor appearance, should go into cameos. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 16:57, 15 March 2007 (CDT)		::: Brucker, can we use piped links in the vidchar template? If so, we can have them direct to their exact section of the piped links page. Unfortunately, I think redirects can only take you to the article, not a particular section. Yeah, I think all the filmography categories of people with only one minor appearance, should go into cameos. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 16:57, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	::::There should be no problem with any of that, you just need to use the "!" template in some cases. Regarding all of this, before the next video comes up and it has to be resolved for some reason that the creators no doubt throw us another curveball: what is our definition of a "cameo" in this case? Appearing in only one video is not enough, as that applies to Bree's mom. Perhaps if they appear in only one video, and have no major importance to the plot as a whole? That would include "Random Girl" and "The Cowboy", I think. <span style="color:Blue">'''''-BRUCKER [[Image:EyeBlueSmall.jpg]] ([[User:Brucker\|Home]]/[[User talk:Brucker\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Brucker\|Contribs]])'''''</span> 18:21, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:57, 15 March 2007
Line 65:		Line 65:

	::Sorry, I should have paid more attention to the categories. I just categorized them the same way as Jonas, but I see what you guys are saying. So is the consensus that all the "filmography" categories of these minor characters be categorized in [[:Category:Cameos]]? Also, I like the idea for a cameos page. Maybe have all the pages for the actors and their characters redirect there?--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 16:51, 15 March 2007 (CDT)		::Sorry, I should have paid more attention to the categories. I just categorized them the same way as Jonas, but I see what you guys are saying. So is the consensus that all the "filmography" categories of these minor characters be categorized in [[:Category:Cameos]]? Also, I like the idea for a cameos page. Maybe have all the pages for the actors and their characters redirect there?--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 16:51, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	::: Brucker, can we use piped links in the vidchar template? If so, we can have them direct to their exact section of the piped links page. Unfortunately, I think redirects can only take you to the article, not a particular section. Yeah, I think all the filmography categories of people with only one minor appearance, should go into cameos. --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 16:57, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 15 March 2007
Line 63:		Line 63:

	:A single page simply called "cameos"? With a little info on the actor and the character. I mean, there's really very, very little info on them. I think that might be the best solution? --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 16:40, 15 March 2007 (CDT)		:A single page simply called "cameos"? With a little info on the actor and the character. I mean, there's really very, very little info on them. I think that might be the best solution? --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 16:40, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	::Sorry, I should have paid more attention to the categories. I just categorized them the same way as Jonas, but I see what you guys are saying. So is the consensus that all the "filmography" categories of these minor characters be categorized in [[:Category:Cameos]]? Also, I like the idea for a cameos page. Maybe have all the pages for the actors and their characters redirect there?--[[User:Jonpro\|Jonpro]] 16:51, 15 March 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 15 March 2007
Line 61:		Line 61:

	Do we have a page for actors that appear in only one video? That might be nice if we don't. I could go for either a page for actors with their characters or a separate page for each category. <span style="color:Blue">'''''-BRUCKER [[Image:EyeBlueSmall.jpg]] ([[User:Brucker\|Home]]/[[User talk:Brucker\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Brucker\|Contribs]])'''''</span> 16:37, 15 March 2007 (CDT)		Do we have a page for actors that appear in only one video? That might be nice if we don't. I could go for either a page for actors with their characters or a separate page for each category. <span style="color:Blue">'''''-BRUCKER [[Image:EyeBlueSmall.jpg]] ([[User:Brucker\|Home]]/[[User talk:Brucker\|Talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Brucker\|Contribs]])'''''</span> 16:37, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+	:A single page simply called "cameos"? With a little info on the actor and the character. I mean, there's really very, very little info on them. I think that might be the best solution? --[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 16:40, 15 March 2007 (CDT)