Template talk:Userbox FanVidWhore - Revision history

Shiori at 22:30, 2 April 2009

2009-04-02T22:30:21Z

Taisetsuna at 14:43, 15 February 2007

2007-02-15T14:43:55Z

Brucker: No need to apologize, IMO.

2007-02-08T20:57:55Z

No need to apologize, IMO.

87.127.97.144 at 18:16, 8 February 2007

2007-02-08T18:16:13Z

Brucker at 18:09, 8 February 2007

2007-02-08T18:09:11Z

LordGreystoke422 at 04:59, 8 February 2007

2007-02-08T04:59:01Z

Brucker at 04:52, 8 February 2007

2007-02-08T04:52:16Z

JayHenry at 02:21, 8 February 2007

2007-02-08T02:21:57Z

Brucker: Opinions wanted: Is this inappropriate?

2007-02-08T01:35:28Z

Opinions wanted: Is this inappropriate?

OwenIsCool at 00:28, 8 February 2007

2007-02-08T00:28:15Z

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 :Then don't put it on your userpage.  Problem solved!  [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 18:28, 7 February 2007 (CST)
-::Is there anyone else who thinks this shouldn't exist? I don't want to be insensitive, but I do tend to agree with OiC on the matter. Words worse than "whore" can be found in [[Four-letter words|various places]] on the LGPedia, and so long as this stays on User pages of willing users, I see no problem myself. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 19:35, 7 February 2007 (CST)
+::Is there anyone else who thinks this shouldn't exist? I don't want to be insensitive, but I do tend to agree with OiC on the matter. Words worse than "whore" can be found in various places on the LGPedia, and so long as this stays on User pages of willing users, I see no problem myself. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 19:35, 7 February 2007 (CST)
 :::Ridiculous.  Sorry, but if parents don't want their children seeing words like "whore" they need to keep them away from the big-bad-internet.  I think you can even get away with one "whore" in a PG movie.  So gimme a break.  The person who finds it inappropriate is behaving increasingly like a troll and I don't think we should pander to this nonsense.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 20:21, 7 February 2007 (CST)
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 :This template is intended for usage on '''user pages''', and as far as I am concerned, anybody can put whatever they want on their own user page so long as it isn't pornography, hate speech, or anything illegal such as libel. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 14:57, 8 February 2007 (CST)
-:I don't think the word "whore" is any worse than the [[Four-letter words]] used in the series itself.  Personally, I don't find this template to be offensive. --[[User:Taisetsuna|tai]] 08:43, 15 February 2007 (CST)
+:I don't think the word "whore" is any worse than the Four-letter words used in the series itself.  Personally, I don't find this template to be offensive. --[[User:Taisetsuna|tai]] 08:43, 15 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 15 February 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:This template is intended for usage on '''user pages''', and as far as I am concerned, anybody can put whatever they want on their own user page so long as it isn't pornography, hate speech, or anything illegal such as libel. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 14:57, 8 February 2007 (CST)		:This template is intended for usage on '''user pages''', and as far as I am concerned, anybody can put whatever they want on their own user page so long as it isn't pornography, hate speech, or anything illegal such as libel. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 14:57, 8 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:I don't think the word "whore" is any worse than the [[Four-letter words]] used in the series itself. Personally, I don't find this template to be offensive. --[[User:Taisetsuna\|tai]] 08:43, 15 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 8 February 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:

	::::Then again, maybe a Brit would be offended that the only British character in the series was revealed to be evil and then killed off? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 12:09, 8 February 2007 (CST)		::::Then again, maybe a Brit would be offended that the only British character in the series was revealed to be evil and then killed off? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 12:09, 8 February 2007 (CST)
−

	Look, i didnt know the site was 13+, ever so sorry. And I can tell you, now, gemma aint british, not with that accent, she is either RSA, AUS or NZ. No wonder Nikki B couldnt find out anything at the consulate! and as for "he party voicing the concern is the guy that you already banned from the Pedia and protected my page for the cyberstalking." I have no idea about this; i only started coming on here this month.		Look, i didnt know the site was 13+, ever so sorry. And I can tell you, now, gemma aint british, not with that accent, she is either RSA, AUS or NZ. No wonder Nikki B couldnt find out anything at the consulate! and as for "he party voicing the concern is the guy that you already banned from the Pedia and protected my page for the cyberstalking." I have no idea about this; i only started coming on here this month.
		+
		+	:I haven't seen any evidence that you are a "troll", just perhaps a bit more picky than some of us. I certainly don't see any solid evidence that you are the person LG422 thinks you are, and if you don't act like he did when he was here before, I really don't care. I just want us to all be civil to one another.
		+
		+	:This template is intended for usage on '''user pages''', and as far as I am concerned, anybody can put whatever they want on their own user page so long as it isn't pornography, hate speech, or anything illegal such as libel. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 14:57, 8 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 8 February 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:

	::::Then again, maybe a Brit would be offended that the only British character in the series was revealed to be evil and then killed off? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 12:09, 8 February 2007 (CST)		::::Then again, maybe a Brit would be offended that the only British character in the series was revealed to be evil and then killed off? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 12:09, 8 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+
		+	Look, i didnt know the site was 13+, ever so sorry. And I can tell you, now, gemma aint british, not with that accent, she is either RSA, AUS or NZ. No wonder Nikki B couldnt find out anything at the consulate! and as for "he party voicing the concern is the guy that you already banned from the Pedia and protected my page for the cyberstalking." I have no idea about this; i only started coming on here this month.

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 8 February 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:

	:::::Brucker, I was somewhat reluctant to ask for this tag because I had my concerns for the little ones..but let's face it..they use worse language than we do. This site is supposed to be 13+. There may be others offended..who knows....but, LG15 itself has not been without profanity. I do say that someone putting this Box on the page of someone not wanting it should be warned. Finally, the only reason that concern was voiced was because it involved me. The party voicing the concern is the guy that you already banned from the Pedia and protected my page for the cyberstalking. Ya know what's the biggest shame..if the guy would stop just trying to be a ROYAL British PRIG..I think he could make a good contribution to the LGpedia. He just has a little too big a chip on his shoulder involving me and the United States..maybe that's why he hates me...as I wear US Flag shirts a LOT. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 22:59, 7 February 2007 (CST)		:::::Brucker, I was somewhat reluctant to ask for this tag because I had my concerns for the little ones..but let's face it..they use worse language than we do. This site is supposed to be 13+. There may be others offended..who knows....but, LG15 itself has not been without profanity. I do say that someone putting this Box on the page of someone not wanting it should be warned. Finally, the only reason that concern was voiced was because it involved me. The party voicing the concern is the guy that you already banned from the Pedia and protected my page for the cyberstalking. Ya know what's the biggest shame..if the guy would stop just trying to be a ROYAL British PRIG..I think he could make a good contribution to the LGpedia. He just has a little too big a chip on his shoulder involving me and the United States..maybe that's why he hates me...as I wear US Flag shirts a LOT. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 22:59, 7 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::::Then again, maybe a Brit would be offended that the only British character in the series was revealed to be evil and then killed off? --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 12:09, 8 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 8 February 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::::I just think we should leave the subject open for a day or two so the complaintant can't keep accusing us of favoritism. The truth is, some people may truly be offended, and we ought to at thevery least give them a chance to voice their opinion. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:52, 7 February 2007 (CST)		::::I just think we should leave the subject open for a day or two so the complaintant can't keep accusing us of favoritism. The truth is, some people may truly be offended, and we ought to at thevery least give them a chance to voice their opinion. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:52, 7 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+
		+	:::::Brucker, I was somewhat reluctant to ask for this tag because I had my concerns for the little ones..but let's face it..they use worse language than we do. This site is supposed to be 13+. There may be others offended..who knows....but, LG15 itself has not been without profanity. I do say that someone putting this Box on the page of someone not wanting it should be warned. Finally, the only reason that concern was voiced was because it involved me. The party voicing the concern is the guy that you already banned from the Pedia and protected my page for the cyberstalking. Ya know what's the biggest shame..if the guy would stop just trying to be a ROYAL British PRIG..I think he could make a good contribution to the LGpedia. He just has a little too big a chip on his shoulder involving me and the United States..maybe that's why he hates me...as I wear US Flag shirts a LOT. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 22:59, 7 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 8 February 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:::Ridiculous. Sorry, but if parents don't want their children seeing words like "whore" they need to keep them away from the big-bad-internet. I think you can even get away with one "whore" in a PG movie. So gimme a break. The person who finds it inappropriate is behaving increasingly like a troll and I don't think we should pander to this nonsense.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 20:21, 7 February 2007 (CST)		:::Ridiculous. Sorry, but if parents don't want their children seeing words like "whore" they need to keep them away from the big-bad-internet. I think you can even get away with one "whore" in a PG movie. So gimme a break. The person who finds it inappropriate is behaving increasingly like a troll and I don't think we should pander to this nonsense.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 20:21, 7 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::::I just think we should leave the subject open for a day or two so the complaintant can't keep accusing us of favoritism. The truth is, some people may truly be offended, and we ought to at thevery least give them a chance to voice their opinion. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 22:52, 7 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 8 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	::Is there anyone else who thinks this shouldn't exist? I don't want to be insensitive, but I do tend to agree with OiC on the matter. Words worse than "whore" can be found in [[Four-letter words\|various places]] on the LGPedia, and so long as this stays on User pages of willing users, I see no problem myself. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 19:35, 7 February 2007 (CST)		::Is there anyone else who thinks this shouldn't exist? I don't want to be insensitive, but I do tend to agree with OiC on the matter. Words worse than "whore" can be found in [[Four-letter words\|various places]] on the LGPedia, and so long as this stays on User pages of willing users, I see no problem myself. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 19:35, 7 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	:::Ridiculous. Sorry, but if parents don't want their children seeing words like "whore" they need to keep them away from the big-bad-internet. I think you can even get away with one "whore" in a PG movie. So gimme a break. The person who finds it inappropriate is behaving increasingly like a troll and I don't think we should pander to this nonsense.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 20:21, 7 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:35, 8 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Then don't put it on your userpage. Problem solved! [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 18:28, 7 February 2007 (CST)		:Then don't put it on your userpage. Problem solved! [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 18:28, 7 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::Is there anyone else who thinks this shouldn't exist? I don't want to be insensitive, but I do tend to agree with OiC on the matter. Words worse than "whore" can be found in [[Four-letter words\|various places]] on the LGPedia, and so long as this stays on User pages of willing users, I see no problem myself. --[[User:Brucker\|Brucker]] 19:35, 7 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:28, 8 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I'm sorry, but I find the language of this totally innappropriaitee.		I'm sorry, but I find the language of this totally innappropriaitee.
		+
		+	:Then don't put it on your userpage. Problem solved! [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 18:28, 7 February 2007 (CST)