User talk:LordGreystoke422 - Revision history

Platypusrex256: /* boo for quiters */

2007-09-27T19:34:44Z

‎boo for quiters

Zoey at 22:25, 13 May 2007

2007-05-13T22:25:40Z

Platypusrex256: boo for quiters

2007-04-23T20:57:06Z

boo for quiters

Iris2009 at 22:13, 17 February 2007

2007-02-17T22:13:05Z

Iris2009: wrong name forgot to sign in.

2007-02-17T21:55:28Z

wrong name forgot to sign in.

209.180.130.29: Sorry to suggest, but i may be right.

2007-02-17T21:54:37Z

Sorry to suggest, but i may be right.

OwenIsCool at 21:14, 17 February 2007

2007-02-17T21:14:30Z

LordGreystoke422 at 01:19, 17 February 2007

2007-02-17T01:19:35Z

70.196.60.126 at 01:18, 17 February 2007

2007-02-17T01:18:46Z

JayHenry at 20:09, 16 February 2007

2007-02-16T20:09:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:34, 27 September 2007
Line 96:		Line 96:
	== boo for quiters ==		== boo for quiters ==

−	who's giving you crap, grey? you should give me their home adress and i'll mail them a ton of bricks to shove up their rear ends! ~~you're~~ videos were the best and i've been bumming out (no pun intended) ever since you quit. - [[user:platypusrex256\|platypus]] april 23 2007	+	who's giving you crap, grey? you should give me their home adress and i'll mail them a ton of bricks to shove up their rear ends! your videos were the best and i've been bumming out (no pun intended) ever since you quit. - [[user:platypusrex256\|platypus]] april 23 2007

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:25, 13 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Hmm... so I'm confused. How many different Franks are we working with [[Frankiswaking]], [[Franklin]], [[Frankiswaiting@gmail.com\|Frankiswaiting]] and yet another? (''Jay's head starts spinning.'') Was the Frank in [[Cassieiswatching\|CIW]] known as anything other than Frank? If so, it would be good to say so in the name of his article. So, for example, maybe [[Frank (schizophrenic)]] or [[Frank (CIW character)]] or something like that. Then, with this many Frank's, we should probably make the [http://www.lonelygirl15.com/lgpedia/index.php?title=Frank&redirect=no Frank] page into a disambiguation.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 10:01, 11 January 2007 (CST)	+	Hmm... so I'm confused. How many different Franks are we working with [[Frankiswaking]], [[Franklin]], [[Frankiswaiting@gmail.com\|Frankiswaiting]] and yet another? (''Jay's head starts spinning.'') Was the Frank in [[Cassieiswatching\|CIW]] known as anything other than Frank? If so, it would be good to say so in the name of his article. So, for example, maybe Frank (schizophrenic) or Frank (CIW character) or something like that. Then, with this many Frank's, we should probably make the [http://www.lonelygirl15.com/lgpedia/index.php?title=Frank&redirect=no Frank] page into a disambiguation.--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 10:01, 11 January 2007 (CST)

	:Yeah, in wikis a disambiguation page is exactly what you described, a short page that gives brief descriptions of the different Franks and links to the full article. I started one at [[Frank]].--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 10:37, 11 January 2007 (CST)		:Yeah, in wikis a disambiguation page is exactly what you described, a short page that gives brief descriptions of the different Franks and links to the full article. I started one at [[Frank]].--[[User:JayHenry\|JayHenry]] 10:37, 11 January 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 23 April 2007
Line 93:		Line 93:
	::::: OK, i went through all the links and areas people mentioned and noticed the whole story.		::::: OK, i went through all the links and areas people mentioned and noticed the whole story.
	I Think that LG422 was being attacked by a Certain IP, which made him attack back. i have seen these IP user attacks back and forth with him, and honestly if i got that i would be ticked off as well. Even though i Hardly get along with LG422 i think his videos are great and i like how he has helped with LGpedia, Thats why i asked him to pm me in the forum, but a mod deleted it (you should know) i think that everone is right on some parts or another and yes, i have been wrong in the past and done wrong, but i was forgiven. LG422 just go back to do what you already have been doing and try not to start anymore fights, Same with the certain IP user. I think everyone is Family and is welcomed to say what they please inless carryed away, And if Name calling keeps going i think a bann would be under way. along with the ip attacks. Im sorry to suggest this but it would give time for a kool off.because the way i see it [[LGPedia:No Personal Attacks]] :( --[[User:Iris2009\|TJ Marsh]] 15:55, 17 February 2007 (CST)		I Think that LG422 was being attacked by a Certain IP, which made him attack back. i have seen these IP user attacks back and forth with him, and honestly if i got that i would be ticked off as well. Even though i Hardly get along with LG422 i think his videos are great and i like how he has helped with LGpedia, Thats why i asked him to pm me in the forum, but a mod deleted it (you should know) i think that everone is right on some parts or another and yes, i have been wrong in the past and done wrong, but i was forgiven. LG422 just go back to do what you already have been doing and try not to start anymore fights, Same with the certain IP user. I think everyone is Family and is welcomed to say what they please inless carryed away, And if Name calling keeps going i think a bann would be under way. along with the ip attacks. Im sorry to suggest this but it would give time for a kool off.because the way i see it [[LGPedia:No Personal Attacks]] :( --[[User:Iris2009\|TJ Marsh]] 15:55, 17 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	== boo for quiters ==
		+
		+	who's giving you crap, grey? you should give me their home adress and i'll mail them a ton of bricks to shove up their rear ends! you're videos were the best and i've been bumming out (no pun intended) ever since you quit. - [[user:platypusrex256\|platypus]] april 23 2007

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 17 February 2007
Line 92:		Line 92:

	::::: OK, i went through all the links and areas people mentioned and noticed the whole story.		::::: OK, i went through all the links and areas people mentioned and noticed the whole story.
−	I Think that LG422 was being attacked by a Certain IP, which made him attack back. i have seen these IP user attacks back and forth with him, and honestly if i got that i would be ticked off as well. Even though i Hardly get along with LG422 i think his videos are great and i like how he has helped with LGpedia, Thats why i asked him to pm me in the forum, but a mod deleted it (you should know) i think that everone is right on some parts or another and yes, i have been wrong in the past and done wrong, but i was forgiven. LG422 just go back to do what you already have been doing and try not to start anymore fights, Same with the certain IP user. I think everyone is Family and is welcomed to say what they please inless carryed away, And if Name calling keeps going i think a bann would be under way. along with the ip attacks. Im sorry to suggest this but it would give time for a kool off. :( --[[User:Iris2009\|TJ Marsh]] 15:55, 17 February 2007 (CST)	+	I Think that LG422 was being attacked by a Certain IP, which made him attack back. i have seen these IP user attacks back and forth with him, and honestly if i got that i would be ticked off as well. Even though i Hardly get along with LG422 i think his videos are great and i like how he has helped with LGpedia, Thats why i asked him to pm me in the forum, but a mod deleted it (you should know) i think that everone is right on some parts or another and yes, i have been wrong in the past and done wrong, but i was forgiven. LG422 just go back to do what you already have been doing and try not to start anymore fights, Same with the certain IP user. I think everyone is Family and is welcomed to say what they please inless carryed away, And if Name calling keeps going i think a bann would be under way. along with the ip attacks. Im sorry to suggest this but it would give time for a kool off.because the way i see it [[LGPedia:No Personal Attacks]] :( --[[User:Iris2009\|TJ Marsh]] 15:55, 17 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:55, 17 February 2007
Line 92:		Line 92:

	::::: OK, i went through all the links and areas people mentioned and noticed the whole story.		::::: OK, i went through all the links and areas people mentioned and noticed the whole story.
−	I Think that LG422 was being attacked by a Certain IP, which made him attack back. i have seen these IP user attacks back and forth with him, and honestly if i got that i would be ticked off as well. Even though i Hardly get along with LG422 i think his videos are great and i like how he has helped with LGpedia, Thats why i asked him to pm me in the forum, but a mod deleted it (you should know) i think that everone is right on some parts or another and yes, i have been wrong in the past and done wrong, but i was forgiven. LG422 just go back to do what you already have been doing and try not to start anymore fights, Same with the certain IP user. I think everyone is Family and is welcomed to say what they please inless carryed away, And if Name calling keeps going i think a bann would be under way. along with the ip attacks. Im sorry to suggest this but it would give time for a kool off. :( --[[User:~~209.180.130.29~~\|~~209.180.130.29~~]] 15:54, 17 February 2007 (CST)	+	I Think that LG422 was being attacked by a Certain IP, which made him attack back. i have seen these IP user attacks back and forth with him, and honestly if i got that i would be ticked off as well. Even though i Hardly get along with LG422 i think his videos are great and i like how he has helped with LGpedia, Thats why i asked him to pm me in the forum, but a mod deleted it (you should know) i think that everone is right on some parts or another and yes, i have been wrong in the past and done wrong, but i was forgiven. LG422 just go back to do what you already have been doing and try not to start anymore fights, Same with the certain IP user. I think everyone is Family and is welcomed to say what they please inless carryed away, And if Name calling keeps going i think a bann would be under way. along with the ip attacks. Im sorry to suggest this but it would give time for a kool off. :( --[[User:Iris2009\|TJ Marsh]] 15:55, 17 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 17 February 2007
Line 90:		Line 90:
	::::#On fanning the flame. LG422, the more you talk the more obvious it becomes that your claims don't hold any water. For your own credibility's sake, you should stop accusing people of being against you, and you should take a deep breath and realize that no one is after you (except in your series, of course). Speaking of videos, I see no reason to take them down. You don't have a grudge with your fans, and they're the only ones who will be hurt (for lack of a better word) by your removing your series. Furthermore, like I've said before on your Talk page you're a good editor aside from the outbursts you tend to have against other users (and against admins when your're at the forum). I try not to take it personally, but honestly I did stand up for you more than once (see [[User talk:OwenIsCool#Deriders\|my talk]] for an example of your thanking me for it), and the other admins have all been helpful to you in many ways--it's quite disappointing how quickly you forget these things.		::::#On fanning the flame. LG422, the more you talk the more obvious it becomes that your claims don't hold any water. For your own credibility's sake, you should stop accusing people of being against you, and you should take a deep breath and realize that no one is after you (except in your series, of course). Speaking of videos, I see no reason to take them down. You don't have a grudge with your fans, and they're the only ones who will be hurt (for lack of a better word) by your removing your series. Furthermore, like I've said before on your Talk page you're a good editor aside from the outbursts you tend to have against other users (and against admins when your're at the forum). I try not to take it personally, but honestly I did stand up for you more than once (see [[User talk:OwenIsCool#Deriders\|my talk]] for an example of your thanking me for it), and the other admins have all been helpful to you in many ways--it's quite disappointing how quickly you forget these things.
	::::[[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:14, 17 February 2007 (CST)		::::[[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:14, 17 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::::: OK, i went through all the links and areas people mentioned and noticed the whole story.
		+	I Think that LG422 was being attacked by a Certain IP, which made him attack back. i have seen these IP user attacks back and forth with him, and honestly if i got that i would be ticked off as well. Even though i Hardly get along with LG422 i think his videos are great and i like how he has helped with LGpedia, Thats why i asked him to pm me in the forum, but a mod deleted it (you should know) i think that everone is right on some parts or another and yes, i have been wrong in the past and done wrong, but i was forgiven. LG422 just go back to do what you already have been doing and try not to start anymore fights, Same with the certain IP user. I think everyone is Family and is welcomed to say what they please inless carryed away, And if Name calling keeps going i think a bann would be under way. along with the ip attacks. Im sorry to suggest this but it would give time for a kool off. :( --[[User:209.180.130.29\|209.180.130.29]] 15:54, 17 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 17 February 2007
Line 84:		Line 84:

	:::How very professional of you to use the term lying Jay...when anyone can check the histories and see that I was more likely mistaken in that another admin had indeed reverted the removal of the Knob of cheese userbox. It can also be noted that the Knob of Cheese userbox which clearly goes against the universal standards for wiki userboxes was left in place by other Admin along with the other boxes intended to harass me. Additionally, Jay..maybe you should take your own advice and not strike back. If you want a high standard then maybe the admin should set the example. You just pretty basically called me a liar. How is this any different from what you claim I have done? There is the fact that you are an administrator here..but in my opinion that puts you on a higher standard than the regular members at the very least. The fact that you came and made comments on my user talk page in response to other members comments also shows a need on your part to strike back. Honestly, hold yourself to your own standards. This was the sort of thing I was referring to with the NEEDLESS(whoops..there goes that aggressive cap thing.) complaining about silly harmless personal userpage stuff. It wasn't a different opinion, it was needless bickering which I illustrated briefly with excerpts from the wiki userbox guidelines that are linked to from here. I could see that this was starting to become a bit of a problem and was trying to address it directly. Instead of squashing any further controversy, the admin fanned the fire. Also ,it is interesting in that you mention that I was reprimanded when Milo made no mention of any admin actions towards me. He simply spoke out in favor of userbox free speech. You yourself basically threw a bit of a savage tirade my way over defending myself back on the HSAOKeynote speaker talk. Honestly, most of what you accuse me of.. you do yourself. Maybe you need to take a step back sometimes before you post on talk pages like you suggest I do. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 19:19, 16 February 2007 (CST)		:::How very professional of you to use the term lying Jay...when anyone can check the histories and see that I was more likely mistaken in that another admin had indeed reverted the removal of the Knob of cheese userbox. It can also be noted that the Knob of Cheese userbox which clearly goes against the universal standards for wiki userboxes was left in place by other Admin along with the other boxes intended to harass me. Additionally, Jay..maybe you should take your own advice and not strike back. If you want a high standard then maybe the admin should set the example. You just pretty basically called me a liar. How is this any different from what you claim I have done? There is the fact that you are an administrator here..but in my opinion that puts you on a higher standard than the regular members at the very least. The fact that you came and made comments on my user talk page in response to other members comments also shows a need on your part to strike back. Honestly, hold yourself to your own standards. This was the sort of thing I was referring to with the NEEDLESS(whoops..there goes that aggressive cap thing.) complaining about silly harmless personal userpage stuff. It wasn't a different opinion, it was needless bickering which I illustrated briefly with excerpts from the wiki userbox guidelines that are linked to from here. I could see that this was starting to become a bit of a problem and was trying to address it directly. Instead of squashing any further controversy, the admin fanned the fire. Also ,it is interesting in that you mention that I was reprimanded when Milo made no mention of any admin actions towards me. He simply spoke out in favor of userbox free speech. You yourself basically threw a bit of a savage tirade my way over defending myself back on the HSAOKeynote speaker talk. Honestly, most of what you accuse me of.. you do yourself. Maybe you need to take a step back sometimes before you post on talk pages like you suggest I do. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 19:19, 16 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::::Et tu, LordGreystoke422? If you hadn't come back to continue spreading misinformation, I would have let it go, but since you're back to keep blaming others for your inability to play nice with the other children, I'm afraid I'll have to clear some things up.
		+	::::#On consistency and knobs of cheese. There is no knob of cheese userbox; they are all listed at [[Userbox]]. To find this elusive userbox, you'll have to go to [[User:SheriffOfNottingham]] where this user has chosen to put userbox code on his page to say that he has been ''rumoured'' to have called LG422 a knob of cheese. When an anonymous IP blanked this user's page, an admin restored it. How were we to know that this was LG422's way of expressing his disapproval? Should have brought it up on the guys talk page if he wanted to sort things out. That code is '''not''' a real userbox and we have not encouraged other people to ridicule LG422. In fact, if you go to [[User talk:SheriffOfNottingham]] you'll see it was none other than JayHenry who stood up for LG422 and pointed out to this user that his userboxes were inappropriate. The only lack of consistency here, is in LG422's very selective memory. See the history of Sherriff's page if you want to see the blanking done by the IP I mentioned.
		+	::::#On Nazis, trolls and bullies. LG422 seems to have thought it'd be appropriate to call the admins "Nazis" on this [http://www.lonelygirl15.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=179215&highlight=#179215 forum thread]. He was very concerned that we would delete the [[Moonchild]] article if he didn't work on it, and quick! Nevermind that as per our [[LGPedia:Deletion Policy\|deletion policy]], we never outright delete articles. In fact, [[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] (me! a so-called Nazi!) was who encouraged LG422 to rewrite this article. Please see for yourself at [[Talk:Aleister Crowley]]. Please also look at LG422's [[Special:Contributions/LordGreystoke422\|contributions]], the edits to Talk pages specifically, to get an idea of his aggressive behavior towards other users. And I don't just mean using all caps. Shooting down other fanfic, accusing any random IP that crosses his path of being a stalker, I don't know how he can call others "unprofessional" with a straight face. Actually, don't bother going to his contributions. His above reply to JayHenry was pretty representative (albeit on the mild side) of the rambling accusations that characterize his interactions with other users.
		+	::::#On fanning the flame. LG422, the more you talk the more obvious it becomes that your claims don't hold any water. For your own credibility's sake, you should stop accusing people of being against you, and you should take a deep breath and realize that no one is after you (except in your series, of course). Speaking of videos, I see no reason to take them down. You don't have a grudge with your fans, and they're the only ones who will be hurt (for lack of a better word) by your removing your series. Furthermore, like I've said before on your Talk page you're a good editor aside from the outbursts you tend to have against other users (and against admins when your're at the forum). I try not to take it personally, but honestly I did stand up for you more than once (see [[User talk:OwenIsCool#Deriders\|my talk]] for an example of your thanking me for it), and the other admins have all been helpful to you in many ways--it's quite disappointing how quickly you forget these things.
		+	::::[[User:OwenIsCool\|OwenIsCool]] 15:14, 17 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 17 February 2007
Line 83:		Line 83:


−	:::How very professional of you to use the term lying Jay...when anyone can check the histories and see that I was more likely mistaken in that another admin had indeed reverted the removal of the Knob of cheese userbox. It can also be noted that the Knob of Cheese userbox which clearly goes against the universal standards for wiki userboxes was left in place by other Admin along with the other boxes intended to harass me. Additionally, Jay..maybe you should take your own advice and not strike back. If you want a high standard then maybe the admin should set the example. You just pretty basically called me a liar. How is this any different from what you claim I have done? There is the fact that you are an administrator here..but in my opinion that puts you on a higher standard than the regular members at the very least. The fact that you came and made comments on my user talk page in response to other members comments also shows a need on your part to strike back. Honestly, hold yourself to your own standards. This was the sort of thing I was referring to with the NEEDLESS(whoops..there goes that aggressive cap thing.) complaining about silly harmless personal userpage stuff. It wasn't a different opinion, it was needless bickering which I illustrated briefly with excerpts from the wiki userbox guidelines that are linked to from here. I could see that this was starting to become a bit of a problem and was trying to address it directly. Instead of squashing any further controversy, the admin fanned the fire. Also ,it is interesting in that you mention that I was reprimanded when Milo made no mention of any admin actions towards me. He simply spoke out in favor of userbox free speech. You yourself basically threw a bit of a savage tirade my way over defending myself back on the HSAOKeynote speaker talk. Honestly, most of what you accuse me of.. you do yourself. Maybe you need to take a step back sometimes before you post on talk pages like you suggest I do. --[[User:~~70.196.60.126~~\|~~70.196.60.126~~]] 19:18, 16 February 2007 (CST)	+	:::How very professional of you to use the term lying Jay...when anyone can check the histories and see that I was more likely mistaken in that another admin had indeed reverted the removal of the Knob of cheese userbox. It can also be noted that the Knob of Cheese userbox which clearly goes against the universal standards for wiki userboxes was left in place by other Admin along with the other boxes intended to harass me. Additionally, Jay..maybe you should take your own advice and not strike back. If you want a high standard then maybe the admin should set the example. You just pretty basically called me a liar. How is this any different from what you claim I have done? There is the fact that you are an administrator here..but in my opinion that puts you on a higher standard than the regular members at the very least. The fact that you came and made comments on my user talk page in response to other members comments also shows a need on your part to strike back. Honestly, hold yourself to your own standards. This was the sort of thing I was referring to with the NEEDLESS(whoops..there goes that aggressive cap thing.) complaining about silly harmless personal userpage stuff. It wasn't a different opinion, it was needless bickering which I illustrated briefly with excerpts from the wiki userbox guidelines that are linked to from here. I could see that this was starting to become a bit of a problem and was trying to address it directly. Instead of squashing any further controversy, the admin fanned the fire. Also ,it is interesting in that you mention that I was reprimanded when Milo made no mention of any admin actions towards me. He simply spoke out in favor of userbox free speech. You yourself basically threw a bit of a savage tirade my way over defending myself back on the HSAOKeynote speaker talk. Honestly, most of what you accuse me of.. you do yourself. Maybe you need to take a step back sometimes before you post on talk pages like you suggest I do. --[[User:LordGreystoke422\|LordGreystoke422]] 19:19, 16 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:18, 17 February 2007
Line 81:		Line 81:

	::Nice try, but not true. I never reverted any userboxes calling you a knob of cheese. Greystoke, please, this is a wiki -- anyone can check the edit histories and see that you're lying.--[[User:JayHenry]] 14:07, 16 February 2007 (CST)		::Nice try, but not true. I never reverted any userboxes calling you a knob of cheese. Greystoke, please, this is a wiki -- anyone can check the edit histories and see that you're lying.--[[User:JayHenry]] 14:07, 16 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+
		+	:::How very professional of you to use the term lying Jay...when anyone can check the histories and see that I was more likely mistaken in that another admin had indeed reverted the removal of the Knob of cheese userbox. It can also be noted that the Knob of Cheese userbox which clearly goes against the universal standards for wiki userboxes was left in place by other Admin along with the other boxes intended to harass me. Additionally, Jay..maybe you should take your own advice and not strike back. If you want a high standard then maybe the admin should set the example. You just pretty basically called me a liar. How is this any different from what you claim I have done? There is the fact that you are an administrator here..but in my opinion that puts you on a higher standard than the regular members at the very least. The fact that you came and made comments on my user talk page in response to other members comments also shows a need on your part to strike back. Honestly, hold yourself to your own standards. This was the sort of thing I was referring to with the NEEDLESS(whoops..there goes that aggressive cap thing.) complaining about silly harmless personal userpage stuff. It wasn't a different opinion, it was needless bickering which I illustrated briefly with excerpts from the wiki userbox guidelines that are linked to from here. I could see that this was starting to become a bit of a problem and was trying to address it directly. Instead of squashing any further controversy, the admin fanned the fire. Also ,it is interesting in that you mention that I was reprimanded when Milo made no mention of any admin actions towards me. He simply spoke out in favor of userbox free speech. You yourself basically threw a bit of a savage tirade my way over defending myself back on the HSAOKeynote speaker talk. Honestly, most of what you accuse me of.. you do yourself. Maybe you need to take a step back sometimes before you post on talk pages like you suggest I do. --[[User:70.196.60.126\|70.196.60.126]] 19:18, 16 February 2007 (CST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:09, 16 February 2007
Line 79:		Line 79:

	:Knobs of cheese? I am nothing if not underinformed and probably shouldn't have added my 2 cents. I do hate the constitution myself.--[[User:Milowent\|Milowent]] 13:57, 16 February 2007 (CST)		:Knobs of cheese? I am nothing if not underinformed and probably shouldn't have added my 2 cents. I do hate the constitution myself.--[[User:Milowent\|Milowent]] 13:57, 16 February 2007 (CST)
		+
		+	::Nice try, but not true. I never reverted any userboxes calling you a knob of cheese. Greystoke, please, this is a wiki -- anyone can check the edit histories and see that you're lying.--[[User:JayHenry]] 14:07, 16 February 2007 (CST)