Difference between revisions of "LGPedia:Lucy's Balcony"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Puzzles)
(Bottom indexes)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
We all like bottom indexes, right?  At [[template talk:Bree's religion]] we have a prototype sitting around for the religion pages.  My only concern with the Bree's religion index is that I don't understand what "related videos" means.  Do we want to implement a bottom index for other types of pages as well? --[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 23:01, 26 February 2007 (CST)
 
We all like bottom indexes, right?  At [[template talk:Bree's religion]] we have a prototype sitting around for the religion pages.  My only concern with the Bree's religion index is that I don't understand what "related videos" means.  Do we want to implement a bottom index for other types of pages as well? --[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 23:01, 26 February 2007 (CST)
 
:I &hearts bottom indexes.  Last time I tampered with the one for Bree's religion, I took out the "Related videos" thing altogether.  I think we should leave it that way unless someone proposes a good way of determining what a "Related video" is and how that would be useful. [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 00:02, 27 February 2007 (CST)
 
:I &hearts bottom indexes.  Last time I tampered with the one for Bree's religion, I took out the "Related videos" thing altogether.  I think we should leave it that way unless someone proposes a good way of determining what a "Related video" is and how that would be useful. [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 00:02, 27 February 2007 (CST)
 +
::In addition to a "thumbs up" on the bottom indexes, I'd like to say that while I think naming related videos is a good idea, it probably should be done in the body of the page. Rather than vaguely saying "Video X had some info on subject Y," which is what the "related video" concept meant to me, the article should outright say, "In video X, Bree said that her parents were always talking about subject Y." --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 10:00, 27 February 2007 (CST)
  
 
== Puzzles ==
 
== Puzzles ==

Revision as of 16:00, 27 February 2007

This page is intended to be a place where mainly admins (but certainly not exclusively admins) can discuss ongoing issues regarding the LGPedia. To start a new thread, click here

Cast and crew template?

Would a cast and crew template be a good idea? We could have picture, name, birthday, role in series, first appearance/credit and a link to the newly organized production credits. I was thinking it should look like Template:Person, but I'm not crazy about the person template. Perhaps a snazzier "person" template and a new Template:Crew? --JayHenry 22:50, 26 February 2007 (CST)

Yep the Person template could use a little TLC, huh? How would the Crew template be different from a Person template? If it's not too different, perhaps adding a couple of fields to the "snazzed up" person template would do the trick. OwenIsCool 00:02, 27 February 2007 (CST)

Bottom indexes

We all like bottom indexes, right? At template talk:Bree's religion we have a prototype sitting around for the religion pages. My only concern with the Bree's religion index is that I don't understand what "related videos" means. Do we want to implement a bottom index for other types of pages as well? --JayHenry 23:01, 26 February 2007 (CST)

I &hearts bottom indexes. Last time I tampered with the one for Bree's religion, I took out the "Related videos" thing altogether. I think we should leave it that way unless someone proposes a good way of determining what a "Related video" is and how that would be useful. OwenIsCool 00:02, 27 February 2007 (CST)
In addition to a "thumbs up" on the bottom indexes, I'd like to say that while I think naming related videos is a good idea, it probably should be done in the body of the page. Rather than vaguely saying "Video X had some info on subject Y," which is what the "related video" concept meant to me, the article should outright say, "In video X, Bree said that her parents were always talking about subject Y." --Brucker 10:00, 27 February 2007 (CST)

Puzzles

I'd like to always include puzzles in the "Recent Developments" column. Good idea? It could be a way to increase visibility like OIC was talking about at Talk:Miss Me? puzzle. --JayHenry 23:11, 26 February 2007 (CST)

Good idea! I second. OwenIsCool 00:02, 27 February 2007 (CST)

i third, i know im not a admin, but i contrbute as much as i can. --TJ Marsh 01:22, 27 February 2007 (CST)