Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cassieiswatching"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(cassieiswatching theories)
(Neutral Point of View)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
I was thinking that it might be helpful to establish a complete-as-possible listing of theories related to cassieiswatching, its clues, and their meanings.  There is such a large body of knowledge currently housed within the forums, that having a data repository of sorts could be extremely beneficial.  Thoughts?
 
I was thinking that it might be helpful to establish a complete-as-possible listing of theories related to cassieiswatching, its clues, and their meanings.  There is such a large body of knowledge currently housed within the forums, that having a data repository of sorts could be extremely beneficial.  Thoughts?
 
--[[User:Twistofreality|Twistofreality]] 10:46, 30 September 2006 (PDT)
 
--[[User:Twistofreality|Twistofreality]] 10:46, 30 September 2006 (PDT)
 +
 +
== Neutral Point of View ==
 +
 +
For those of you unfamiliar with Wikipedia, there is a concept at work there called Neutral Point of View (NPOV).  I'd like to request that this approach be taken within the cassieiswatching section so that speculation is not presented as fact.  Comments/objections?
 +
--[[User:Twistofreality|Twistofreality]] 10:48, 30 September 2006 (PDT)

Revision as of 17:48, 30 September 2006

We're off to a nice start with this article, people. Let's keep plugging away at it.

cassieiswatching theories

I was thinking that it might be helpful to establish a complete-as-possible listing of theories related to cassieiswatching, its clues, and their meanings. There is such a large body of knowledge currently housed within the forums, that having a data repository of sorts could be extremely beneficial. Thoughts? --Twistofreality 10:46, 30 September 2006 (PDT)

Neutral Point of View

For those of you unfamiliar with Wikipedia, there is a concept at work there called Neutral Point of View (NPOV). I'd like to request that this approach be taken within the cassieiswatching section so that speculation is not presented as fact. Comments/objections? --Twistofreality 10:48, 30 September 2006 (PDT)