Difference between revisions of "Talk:It's Not Kidnapping"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Picture Debate)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
I'm pretty sure we've totally exhausted the 'fish taco has sexual connotations' joke.  I thought this photo was better because it showed more characters.  It also gives a better visual of the lengths BDJ are willing to go.  The other one was just a sad Jules?  I dont know, when going through the video I did actually take a snap at that exact second too, because I thought it was a powerful image... I just think the one where Daniel is actually in the /act/ of kidnapping Jules is even MORE powerful in what it says. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 23:25, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
 
I'm pretty sure we've totally exhausted the 'fish taco has sexual connotations' joke.  I thought this photo was better because it showed more characters.  It also gives a better visual of the lengths BDJ are willing to go.  The other one was just a sad Jules?  I dont know, when going through the video I did actually take a snap at that exact second too, because I thought it was a powerful image... I just think the one where Daniel is actually in the /act/ of kidnapping Jules is even MORE powerful in what it says. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 23:25, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
 
*I certainly see your point.  However, I still like mine better. :->  From a technical standpoint, though, your screencaps are a little small and low-quality.  Is there any way for you to re-upload them, bigger?  If not, I (or someone else, I'm sure) can help you. --[[User:Jbshryne|Jbshryne]] 23:34, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
 
*I certainly see your point.  However, I still like mine better. :->  From a technical standpoint, though, your screencaps are a little small and low-quality.  Is there any way for you to re-upload them, bigger?  If not, I (or someone else, I'm sure) can help you. --[[User:Jbshryne|Jbshryne]] 23:34, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
 +
:I really do not care to see another fish taco fight. It was really lame the first time it occurred. It is definitely uncalled for now considering Jules and the actress that plays her are obviously under age. Yes, Bree is 17 but Jessica Lee Rose is 20 so I can see as to why it was semi-acceptable to others. I really think it is uncalled for here. [[User:Chelseyrl|Chelseyrl]] 23:41, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 04:41, 8 May 2007

Erm... IMHO, the first pic was better. Mostly because I have a funny caption for it. --Jbshryne 23:14, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

I had a funny caption for it too! It was "dont worry Im not gonna hurt you! I just want to eat your fish taco" Now true that quote didnt really fit with the other ones but I think that one fits with this one because thats what most of these kidnappers want to do! --Xwestsidex 21:19, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Jbshryne, I gotta give it to ya, man. That is a funny ass picture!! And the quote fits hella good!! --Xwestsidex 21:19, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

  • Hehe... thanks. --Jbshryne 23:24, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Picture Debate

I'm pretty sure we've totally exhausted the 'fish taco has sexual connotations' joke. I thought this photo was better because it showed more characters. It also gives a better visual of the lengths BDJ are willing to go. The other one was just a sad Jules? I dont know, when going through the video I did actually take a snap at that exact second too, because I thought it was a powerful image... I just think the one where Daniel is actually in the /act/ of kidnapping Jules is even MORE powerful in what it says. --Zoey 23:25, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

  • I certainly see your point. However, I still like mine better. :-> From a technical standpoint, though, your screencaps are a little small and low-quality. Is there any way for you to re-upload them, bigger? If not, I (or someone else, I'm sure) can help you. --Jbshryne 23:34, 7 May 2007 (CDT)
I really do not care to see another fish taco fight. It was really lame the first time it occurred. It is definitely uncalled for now considering Jules and the actress that plays her are obviously under age. Yes, Bree is 17 but Jessica Lee Rose is 20 so I can see as to why it was semi-acceptable to others. I really think it is uncalled for here. Chelseyrl 23:41, 7 May 2007 (CDT)