Talk:List of New Girl Candidates

From LGPedia
Revision as of 03:45, 24 May 2007 by Misty (Talk | contribs) (rejected92 removal?)

Jump to: navigation, search

how about floraviolax33?--24.19.3.231 22:19, 25 April 2007 (CDT)


thank you for this page. this is all madness! :-) --Milowent 14:01, 20 April 2007 (CDT)

I agree with Milo. We should really try to get this page out onto the Main Page. Maybe as the featured article? I mean, this is a pretty big deal! --JayHenry 14:08, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
We can never figure out featured article stuff anyway (it seems), so I say why not? As Jay says, it definitely is important. Alternatively, we could create another section on the Main Page for things like this. There's usually some new development that people would probably like to see. It would be different from "Latest Developments" in that instead of listing videos it would list the "hot topic" that everyone's talking about in the lonelygirl15 world. I don't know--just an idea. What do others think? I guess it would require reorganizing the Main Page layout....--Jonpro 14:52, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
How about Just putting a link below the Breeniverse section -misty 15:58, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
All right, I spruced up the page a little bit in case we feature it. Might be good to add a one or two sentence blurb about each of these girls. So far all we have is links to their profiles and vids. Some actual info would be nice. OIC out. OwenIsCool 16:47, 20 April 2007 (CDT)
Looks like people have been doing a good job of keeping this page neat and up-to-date. Does anyone else think it's feature worthy? We could put it up today; that "Hunt for Bree" article has been there for weeks! OwenIsCool 12:09, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

Maddison Atkins?

Should we add Maddison Atkins to this list, as she is a potential new girl candidate?

I was thinking the same thing. She is one of the more likly canidates I think.
I think we should definitely add Maddy. --JayHenry 19:13, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
forum feels Maddy doesn't count as it was/is an ARG that will not have even a snowball's chance at canon Tigerlilylynn 19:29, 3 May 2007 (CDT)


Ok, so I think we can safely say, that Jules is the new girl. and that taylor is another canon character who isn't the new girl. This article needs to be put in the past tense. I think its also time to move to a new featured article -misty 00:43, 30 April 2007 (CDT)

rejected92 removal?

Chershaytoute removed rejected92 with the comment "requested by forum users", but didn't give the thread. I put it back until we have a chance to discuss it here and the forum thread is referenced so we can see what the consensus is there. -misty 22:45, 23 May 2007 (CDT)