Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of lonelygirl15 videos/Season 3"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(story Arcs)
Line 53: Line 53:
  
 
:I think that's a good idea. We've been doing that with other pages like [[Notable Details]] so it makes sense to do it here too.--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]]
 
:I think that's a good idea. We've been doing that with other pages like [[Notable Details]] so it makes sense to do it here too.--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]]
 +
 +
== story Arcs ==
 +
 +
I reverted the Bree Poster child heading because the story is really in the same arc as when Bree surrendered, the fact that she appeared on an order video didn't shift the direction of the story: we are still resolving the events of her surrender. -[[User:Misty|misty]] 18:24, 30 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 23:24, 30 May 2007

for older discussions see Talk:List of Lonelygirl15 videos/archive


Adding Nikki Bower and Jules

Ok so it look like Nikki bower is clearly Canon now, as is Jules. Do they belong in this list? They aren't in the left colum yet, but I think that is an oversight by the webmaster, since they are a necessary part of the story -misty 09:35, 17 April 2007 (CDT)

I doubt it's an oversight, more of a way to keep us guessing. I still think we should stick with our rule about videos being in the left column. If they both turn out to be canon, I'm sure they'll add the videos to the column.--Jonpro 10:43, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
Bree's mentioning Nikki and Nikki's exposure of Jules to be semi-reliable, I think that's at least the Creators' way of saying that Nikki is canon. As for Jules, she may not be the "new girl", but she IS a canon character... Nikki (supposedly canon) acknowledged her as the "ceremony girl" and Bree showed a screencap of her YouTube channel in New Girl. --SilverBULLETx3 16:58, 17 April 2007 (CDT)
When you wonder whether a certain video should be on this list, first ask yourself "Is this video on the lg15.com site, in the left hand column with the Bree videos?". That's your answer; those are the videos the c's deemed "required viewing". The first Oppy vid was apparently [not] considered important. As for the screencaps, they're just decorative, but if it bothers you that they include some non-required vids, we can change that too. Sorry if it's confusing. OwenIsCool 14:20, 23 April 2007 (CDT)
Note:I added "not" in my post because I wrote it out from the first time. Sorry to anyone who got thrown off by that. OwenIsCool 18:42, 25 April 2007 (CDT)
I'm sorry, OwenIsCool, but I disagree. "The first Oppy vid was apparently considered important." The first OpAphid video, You Made the Right Choice, Bree!, was not on the left-hand column and was not deemed required viewing, and it is not on this list although IT IS a canon video. I think that all CANON videos should be on this list, and canon apparently now includes Nikki Bower and Jules, unless the Creators are just playing with our heads. Tachyon and Brother are CONFIRMED CANON characters from the Creators, even though they will not be on here anymore due to Glenn's firing... but Op is still on here! ...I stand my case. --72.77.92.54 15:45, 25 April 2007 (CDT)
Whoa, there no need to get excited. Sorry, I meant that it was not considered important. That's why it was left out of the left-hand column of lg15.com, and that's why it's not on this list. I apologize for confusing you with my slip-up. This is really very simple. All we want to do with this page is replicate the left-hand column of videos on lg15.com. If you want to know why Nikki B, Jules, and Tachyon are not on there, please take it up with the Creators. It's not our call and I don't know how they determine what goes and what doesn't.

Ok , I want to revisit the whole issue of including only the videos in the left column. if you notice Bree's first video isn't in the left colume, but no one would say it doesn't belong in this list. I would like to see all canon videos in the list, including all the Nikki Bower, Jules and Taylor videos. And I think that we can decide that by concensus regardless of what the creators do on the homepage. -misty 00:39, 30 April 2007 (CDT)

A couple of Bree's early videos are not on the left column because they are just not on Revver at all. This had to do with copyright issues and not whether the c's wanted them there. There's no question that all Bree videos should be there, the only reason we list them and the c's don't is because we can and they can't. It's a different issue with Oppy, Tachy, Nikki and Jules. They chose to leave those out, for their own reasons, and at LGPedia, we're just cataloging and organizing their stuff. OwenIsCool
I still disagree, OIC. I would love to see Nikki, Jules, Taylor, Tachyon, and Brother videos on this list. Or maybe Tachyon and Brother are out of the picture due to Glenn's firing? But then I would vote for removing Op's videos. The Creators can do what they want on the left-hand column, but just because they do something on the main page, that doesn't mean it can't be on here. I agree with Misty on this issue, and would like to see it resolved, so I am making a talk resolution page so we can figure out exactly what videos need to be on the list. silverX3 11:13, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
I would just like to say that like Gemma and Jonas, Taylor's should probably be included (her pre-Canon ones) --Pheon 19:11, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

the enormous size of this page

Okay, so I'm at a slower computer than I'm normally at, and I just loaded up this page. It took 89 seconds, a minute and a half, to finish loading. I dunno, I think that's sort of a problem. --JayHenry 15:02, 11 May 2007 (CDT)

I brought this up a while back on lucy's balcony. The easiest fix I can think of, would be to get rid of the video expand, but renegade put a lot of work into it, so I think he should have som e say in the matter. -misty 16:02, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
I'm on a pretty fast computer and it takes about a minute to load every time. It gets on my nerves since I'm using IE and I would like it if we got rid of the video expand, but Renegade did put a lot of work into it. silverX3 16:34, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
It's interesting it's taking that long for some of you. It only takes a few seconds for me, and I don't consider my computer to be extraordinarily fast.--Jonpro 17:19, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
the speed of the internet connection makes much more difference than the speed of the computer -misty 17:36, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
I have Verizon FiOS which is supposed to be almost as fast as Comcast High Speed, and everything else loads super quick, but this page takes about a minute. silverX3 11:08, 13 May 2007 (CDT)
well I don't want to step on renagades toes, but it seems we have concensus here to remove the video expand. if anyone come back with a complaint we can always revert. -misty 18:09, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

Line-Height problem

In order for this page to look right we need to keep the line-height the same in all browsers. I've trid to specify the line height in various ways, but I always get more pixels per line in gecko browsers (Firefox, Camino, etc) than I do in other browsers (Safari, IE, etc). Currently I have line-height specified at 20px. Does anyone know how to make the line height the same for all browsers?

While there seems to be a known bug of sorts with IE and line-height (surprise!), are you sure, in this case, that it's not due to IE's different way of calculating height? 'cause, technically, I don't think the <li>s below each other count as a paragraph of text...they should be a bunch of formatted child objects of <ol>. Chances are that line-height would affect the line-height of the text written within the <li>s, i.e. not the space between the <li>s, but the space between multiple lines written within any particular <li>.
...which, of course, creates a new problem: There is no use setting a fixed margin, 'cause IE renders the height differently - you'd have to hack it (examples under the same link).
That's my guess, anyway.
~ Renegade (talk | contribs) 07:36, 16 May 2007 (CDT)
In this case it's a Gecko bug.Currently the line spacing is set to match the montage on Gecko browsers, but be offf on every other browser. Should we change it to match the spacing of IE, Safari, and most other Browsers, or Keep it to match only the Gecko Browsers. -misty 10:11, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
How exactly is this a Gecko bug, or rather: What is bugged? What exactly does FF do differently than IE? Where do the extra pixels come from? (Maybe we can find a workaround.)
~ Renegade (talk | contribs) 10:43, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

Clickable Pics

If no one objects, I think that each of those awesome pictures should redirect to the blog that they're from. (I found myself trying to navigate by clicking them...) I'm gonna start in on doing this. ~ Jbshryne 18:37, 21 May 2007 (CDT)

I think that's a good idea. We've been doing that with other pages like Notable Details so it makes sense to do it here too.--Jonpro

story Arcs

I reverted the Bree Poster child heading because the story is really in the same arc as when Bree surrendered, the fact that she appeared on an order video didn't shift the direction of the story: we are still resolving the events of her surrender. -misty 18:24, 30 May 2007 (CDT)