Difference between revisions of "Talk:Reed"
From LGPedia
Modelmotion (Talk | contribs) (→Reed) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:He himself has stated that he is not canon, and the creators have acknowledged it as well. --[[User:FH14|FH14]], 4 September 2008 (EST) | :He himself has stated that he is not canon, and the creators have acknowledged it as well. --[[User:FH14|FH14]], 4 September 2008 (EST) | ||
::There's too much elements that contradicts with that : the fact that depite the "Community video" status of his videos he is not talking at all about the Breeniverse, and he's always on the LG15-lonelygirl15 webpage even though he, I repeat, is not talking about LG15, is a perfect example. And the fact he never really posted on the forum except... to talk about his videos, ignoring the "You're canon" accusations, is weird : a non-canon guy would answer to that eventually. So, ok, he said he is not canon (as a canon should do, "in-character" style), and the creators said it as well (even though they are members of the "Reed is canon" group on Facebook (with Alexandra Dreyfus)), but I don't think it would be a good idea to "trust" it. Didn't the creators said to the press that it will be more interactivity ? If so, a "community member" isn't a perfect in-character to improve interactivity ? I'm not saying we sould say Reed is canon, or Reed is not canon. All I'm saying is we don't know, and I think the creators would cover their "surprise" if Reed is really canon. So, we better advance hypothesis and not saying things "for certain". [[User:MrTriangleRenversé|MrTriangleRenversé]] 16:21, 4 September 2008 (CDT) | ::There's too much elements that contradicts with that : the fact that depite the "Community video" status of his videos he is not talking at all about the Breeniverse, and he's always on the LG15-lonelygirl15 webpage even though he, I repeat, is not talking about LG15, is a perfect example. And the fact he never really posted on the forum except... to talk about his videos, ignoring the "You're canon" accusations, is weird : a non-canon guy would answer to that eventually. So, ok, he said he is not canon (as a canon should do, "in-character" style), and the creators said it as well (even though they are members of the "Reed is canon" group on Facebook (with Alexandra Dreyfus)), but I don't think it would be a good idea to "trust" it. Didn't the creators said to the press that it will be more interactivity ? If so, a "community member" isn't a perfect in-character to improve interactivity ? I'm not saying we sould say Reed is canon, or Reed is not canon. All I'm saying is we don't know, and I think the creators would cover their "surprise" if Reed is really canon. So, we better advance hypothesis and not saying things "for certain". [[User:MrTriangleRenversé|MrTriangleRenversé]] 16:21, 4 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
| − | |||
::::He is sooo canon. Just watch--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 20:42, 4 September 2008 (CDT) | ::::He is sooo canon. Just watch--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 20:42, 4 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::::Quote from him : "''um… wow. i had no idea they’d feature my second vid… of course, it may not have helped that I bugged the crap out of Amanda to do so. yes, perhaps I am cannon… perhaps not… if I see Jonas or Sarah around Chicago, I’ll let you guys know.''" (source : LG15 Today). He is not saying he is not canon anymore... [[User:MrTriangleRenversé|MrTriangleRenversé]] 03:34, 5 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:34, 5 September 2008
Reed
Since Reed is probably an actor playing Reed in LG15: The Resistance is it really accurate to say that he is played by himself?--modelmotion 11:38, 4 September 2008 (CDT)
- He himself has stated that he is not canon, and the creators have acknowledged it as well. --FH14, 4 September 2008 (EST)
- There's too much elements that contradicts with that : the fact that depite the "Community video" status of his videos he is not talking at all about the Breeniverse, and he's always on the LG15-lonelygirl15 webpage even though he, I repeat, is not talking about LG15, is a perfect example. And the fact he never really posted on the forum except... to talk about his videos, ignoring the "You're canon" accusations, is weird : a non-canon guy would answer to that eventually. So, ok, he said he is not canon (as a canon should do, "in-character" style), and the creators said it as well (even though they are members of the "Reed is canon" group on Facebook (with Alexandra Dreyfus)), but I don't think it would be a good idea to "trust" it. Didn't the creators said to the press that it will be more interactivity ? If so, a "community member" isn't a perfect in-character to improve interactivity ? I'm not saying we sould say Reed is canon, or Reed is not canon. All I'm saying is we don't know, and I think the creators would cover their "surprise" if Reed is really canon. So, we better advance hypothesis and not saying things "for certain". MrTriangleRenversé 16:21, 4 September 2008 (CDT)
- He is sooo canon. Just watch--modelmotion 20:42, 4 September 2008 (CDT)
- Quote from him : "um… wow. i had no idea they’d feature my second vid… of course, it may not have helped that I bugged the crap out of Amanda to do so. yes, perhaps I am cannon… perhaps not… if I see Jonas or Sarah around Chicago, I’ll let you guys know." (source : LG15 Today). He is not saying he is not canon anymore... MrTriangleRenversé 03:34, 5 September 2008 (CDT)
- He is sooo canon. Just watch--modelmotion 20:42, 4 September 2008 (CDT)
- There's too much elements that contradicts with that : the fact that depite the "Community video" status of his videos he is not talking at all about the Breeniverse, and he's always on the LG15-lonelygirl15 webpage even though he, I repeat, is not talking about LG15, is a perfect example. And the fact he never really posted on the forum except... to talk about his videos, ignoring the "You're canon" accusations, is weird : a non-canon guy would answer to that eventually. So, ok, he said he is not canon (as a canon should do, "in-character" style), and the creators said it as well (even though they are members of the "Reed is canon" group on Facebook (with Alexandra Dreyfus)), but I don't think it would be a good idea to "trust" it. Didn't the creators said to the press that it will be more interactivity ? If so, a "community member" isn't a perfect in-character to improve interactivity ? I'm not saying we sould say Reed is canon, or Reed is not canon. All I'm saying is we don't know, and I think the creators would cover their "surprise" if Reed is really canon. So, we better advance hypothesis and not saying things "for certain". MrTriangleRenversé 16:21, 4 September 2008 (CDT)
