Difference between revisions of "Talk:Semiotics"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Altered exposure on the .jpg files)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
  
The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in LIGATURES. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - [[User:Anto687|Anto687]]
+
The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in LIGATURES. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - [[User:Anto687|Anto687]] - EDIT: Not sure if the altered images are worth uploading, as I'm sure that they can be altered (exposure-wise) further, I just don't know where to take them. Let me know if you want to see what I see! [[User:Anto687|Anto687]] 12:19, 27 February 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 18:19, 27 February 2007

In Phoenician, 'pe' is symolic of a mouth, if that's helpful to anyone interpreting the two-legged watcher symbol. --Brucker 17:31, 26 February 2007 (CST)

Thanks, Brucker. Maybe it's what they send you to warn you of impending doom. Like that mark that was put on Jack Sparrow's hand when he was cursed (Pirates of the Caribbean... II, I think). I don't want to update any more until they come up with something definite on the forum though. From the looks of it now they've found microwriting in the images...
This article is starting to get pretty long, and if the microwriting stuff proves relevant, it'd get even longer. Any suggestions on how I could divide it up in a logical way? Not that I'd do it right away, just if it becomes necessary.
OwenIsCool 17:39, 26 February 2007 (CST)


The two backgrounds of the .jpg files are quite similar, with stains and creases in the same places. This is more obvious if the saturation and brightness are reduced and the gamma increased, then alter the settings slighly until you can see the image in black and white clearly. Also, in AMALGAMATION, in the bottem right corner, there is a faint outline of the theta and Pi symbol, which is the same position it appears in LIGATURES. This may indicate staining of the image, as if the other was placed on top of it, but none of the other symbols from LIGATURES show up. Any thoughts? - Anto687 - EDIT: Not sure if the altered images are worth uploading, as I'm sure that they can be altered (exposure-wise) further, I just don't know where to take them. Let me know if you want to see what I see! Anto687 12:19, 27 February 2007 (CST)