Talk:Uncle Dan
|
|
|
Psmith 20:27, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
Wow
That. Was. Bizarre. -BRUCKER 
(Home/Talk/Contribs) 19:53, 14 March 2007 (CDT)
- NO. KIDDING. BUT I loved it!! Question to veteran fans: Was that "Musician" that one vocalist from that band Dee who did that "What have you done, Lonelygirl?" song?? Here's the video on YouTube if you aren't sure what I'm talking about [1] --Phoenician
Soap-Opera-y stuff
they must be really desperate for plot twists. the thing with alex is really...well it's the most soap-opera-y thing to date. and jonas is so gay.--Skeeta 01:37, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
- How is jonas gay o_o --Michiev
- that girl was really coming on to him, and he just seemed disinterested. though maybe it was just cuz he was distracted by daniel and alex. a lot of ppl think he's gay, anyway.--Skeeta 18:51, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
- Ehh, if I was really angry at my drunk, secret-info-spilling, hooking-up-with-my-aunt "friend", I would have been more concerned with getting him out of there. Anyway, he seemed pissed and hardly in the mood for a drunken tryst with one of his aunt's friends. Maybe she's not his type. I'm not putting this forward as anything definite, but I think that Interrogation 101 showed that Jonas might like Bree (well, before she abused him). He accuses Daniel of setting him up so he could "have Bree all to himself". That's a pretty bold accusation to make for someone who wouldn't have been interested in Bree in the first place. OwenIsCool 19:00, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
- no, i disagree. daniel had openly accused jonas of trying to get bree, so that would be a rational accusation to make - he said before that he wasn't interested in bree, but aparently he thought daniel might not be convinced.--Skeeta 02:18, 19 March 2007 (CDT)
Cast
Admin put in the names of the cast, and I'm taking out their descriptions, but here's the reference for those continuing to update:
| Line | Name | Actor |
| "He's 19 years old" | David | Sale Cecere |
| "You're sexy" | Damien | Charlie North |
| "I have two room keys" | Carla | Taylor Treadwell |
| "Some guy was looking for you" | ??? | Unknown |
| "Keep in touch" | Carl | Craig Coyne |
-BRUCKER (Home/Talk/Contribs) 00:18, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
Cast and character pages
Personally, I would have preferred a single page for "people at the party" and a second page for "Actors in Uncle Dan" or however you want to phrase it. Instead we have, what, 20 pages? --JayHenry 16:12, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
- Also, I think the actors in this video should have their category pages belong to Category:Cameos. I don't think they're legitimate members of the Cast and Crew at this point, nor do they need to be included at Category:Credits by person page. These roles are not more important than Katharine McPhee. --JayHenry 16:15, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
I think that your right and thats a good idea, 20 different pages arent necessary unless the people are going to appear in more than one episode. --Michiev
Do we have a page for actors that appear in only one video? That might be nice if we don't. I could go for either a page for actors with their characters or a separate page for each category. -BRUCKER (Home/Talk/Contribs) 16:37, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
- A single page simply called "cameos"? With a little info on the actor and the character. I mean, there's really very, very little info on them. I think that might be the best solution? --JayHenry 16:40, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
- Sorry, I should have paid more attention to the categories. I just categorized them the same way as Jonas, but I see what you guys are saying. So is the consensus that all the "filmography" categories of these minor characters be categorized in Category:Cameos? Also, I like the idea for a cameos page. Maybe have all the pages for the actors and their characters redirect there?--Jonpro 16:51, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
- Brucker, can we use piped links in the vidchar template? If so, we can have them direct to their exact section of the piped links page. Unfortunately, I think redirects can only take you to the article, not a particular section. Yeah, I think all the filmography categories of people with only one minor appearance, should go into cameos. --JayHenry 16:57, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
- There should be no problem with any of that, you just need to use the "!" template in some cases. Regarding all of this, before the next video comes up and it has to be resolved for some reason that the creators no doubt throw us another curveball: what is our definition of a "cameo" in this case? Appearing in only one video is not enough, as that applies to Bree's mom. Perhaps if they appear in only one video, and have no major importance to the plot as a whole? That would include "Random Girl" and "The Cowboy", I think. -BRUCKER
(Home/Talk/Contribs) 18:21, 15 March 2007 (CDT)
- There should be no problem with any of that, you just need to use the "!" template in some cases. Regarding all of this, before the next video comes up and it has to be resolved for some reason that the creators no doubt throw us another curveball: what is our definition of a "cameo" in this case? Appearing in only one video is not enough, as that applies to Bree's mom. Perhaps if they appear in only one video, and have no major importance to the plot as a whole? That would include "Random Girl" and "The Cowboy", I think. -BRUCKER
- It's like the creators are trying to make life difficult for us. The way I see it, the people at the party can still be kept on the cameo page unless some of them start appearing in more videos. I know a nice definition of a "cameo" would be nice, but anytime we come up with a nice definition, it gets shattered. Maybe we can't have a hard-fast rule for everything, and we just need to use our judgment (and discussion) to figure out what's best.--Jonpro 13:01, 16 March 2007 (CDT)
