Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Blog"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
As a database designer, the Blog3 template always struck me as having very poor design in the one fact that it was limited in the number of cast members that could be displayed. In my mind, the number of cast members that could be listed should not be limited, and should not have to be coded in such an odd manner anyway. So now, instead of character1, actor1, character2, actor2, etc., one simply uses [[Template:VidChar]]. The plus side of this that may not be so obvious is that in editing things like our new categorizations of various filmographies for the actors, instead of having to edit six or seven lines of code, we only edit one, and it cascades to all video pages for all cast memebers. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 12:09, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 
As a database designer, the Blog3 template always struck me as having very poor design in the one fact that it was limited in the number of cast members that could be displayed. In my mind, the number of cast members that could be listed should not be limited, and should not have to be coded in such an odd manner anyway. So now, instead of character1, actor1, character2, actor2, etc., one simply uses [[Template:VidChar]]. The plus side of this that may not be so obvious is that in editing things like our new categorizations of various filmographies for the actors, instead of having to edit six or seven lines of code, we only edit one, and it cascades to all video pages for all cast memebers. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 12:09, 21 February 2007 (CST)
  
== YouTube tags ==
+
:Even though the old template had that awkward reverse numbering, I think it's otherwise more intuitive than using this nested template.  I guess I would have a mild preference for retaining the Blog3 template and if there are ever 8 characters in a video (which strikes me as fairly unlikely) we could just add another slot when the moment arises, which I think would be less work than getting used to this new template within a template system. --[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 21:36, 21 February 2007 (CST)
  
 +
::What if the template were simplified, so that rather than
 +
<pre>{{VidChar
 +
character = Bree
 +
actor    = Jessica Lee Rose
 +
}}</pre>
 +
we could use a simplified format of
 +
<pre>{{VidChar|Bree|Jessica Lee Rose}}</pre>
 +
would that be better? It just seems so much more efficient to me. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 12:32, 22 February 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
== YouTube tags ==
 
Would there be a way to make all of the YouTube tags link to their respective pages without having to add square brackets around each one. It's a small thing, but if it's not that hard to do, it would save some time.--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 14:49, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 
Would there be a way to make all of the YouTube tags link to their respective pages without having to add square brackets around each one. It's a small thing, but if it's not that hard to do, it would save some time.--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 14:49, 21 February 2007 (CST)
  
 
:Not only do I not know of a good way to do that, but I'm not 100% sure it's a good idea, since some pages have unique formatting issues, such as [[Thanksgiving]], which has a tag pointing to itself. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 19:00, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 
:Not only do I not know of a good way to do that, but I'm not 100% sure it's a good idea, since some pages have unique formatting issues, such as [[Thanksgiving]], which has a tag pointing to itself. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 19:00, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 
Even though the old template had that awkward reverse numbering, I think it's otherwise more intuitive than using this nested template.  I guess I would have a mild preference for retaining the Blog3 template and if there are ever 8 characters in a video (which strikes me as fairly unlikely) we could just add another slot when the moment arises, which I think would be less work than getting used to this new template within a template system. --[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 21:36, 21 February 2007 (CST)
 

Revision as of 18:32, 22 February 2007

As a database designer, the Blog3 template always struck me as having very poor design in the one fact that it was limited in the number of cast members that could be displayed. In my mind, the number of cast members that could be listed should not be limited, and should not have to be coded in such an odd manner anyway. So now, instead of character1, actor1, character2, actor2, etc., one simply uses Template:VidChar. The plus side of this that may not be so obvious is that in editing things like our new categorizations of various filmographies for the actors, instead of having to edit six or seven lines of code, we only edit one, and it cascades to all video pages for all cast memebers. --Brucker 12:09, 21 February 2007 (CST)

Even though the old template had that awkward reverse numbering, I think it's otherwise more intuitive than using this nested template. I guess I would have a mild preference for retaining the Blog3 template and if there are ever 8 characters in a video (which strikes me as fairly unlikely) we could just add another slot when the moment arises, which I think would be less work than getting used to this new template within a template system. --JayHenry 21:36, 21 February 2007 (CST)
What if the template were simplified, so that rather than
{{VidChar
character = Bree
actor     = Jessica Lee Rose
}}

we could use a simplified format of

{{VidChar|Bree|Jessica Lee Rose}}

would that be better? It just seems so much more efficient to me. --Brucker 12:32, 22 February 2007 (CST)

YouTube tags

Would there be a way to make all of the YouTube tags link to their respective pages without having to add square brackets around each one. It's a small thing, but if it's not that hard to do, it would save some time.--Jonpro 14:49, 21 February 2007 (CST)

Not only do I not know of a good way to do that, but I'm not 100% sure it's a good idea, since some pages have unique formatting issues, such as Thanksgiving, which has a tag pointing to itself. --Brucker 19:00, 21 February 2007 (CST)