Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dharmabum420"

Revision as of 20:44, 11 November 2006

Leave me a message by clicking on the + icon at the top of the page.

Hey, Dharmabum. I guess you like LOST, huh? Me too... I'm obsessed. http://www.losttheblog.blogspot.com is my LOST website... check it out!

   ~Andfound815

Help?

I see you're really booking on a lot of necessary administrative edits, and you seem to know what you're doing. Is there anything you're working on with which I can help?

Glad to have you here! As you can tell, I have no clue how to Admin a wiki, but the great about it is having people like you with more experience here to help out. I will try the signature now Admin 18:16, 30 September 2006 (PDT)

Thanks

Happy to help... I've been a fan of YouTube for a long time. I first got into this back in July, when I saw LG's 'boy problems' video and went to see if she had a wikipedia page. I'm an occasional wikipedian, and the debate there was ridiculous, but got me hooked on the series.

--JayHenry 14:23, 1 October 2006 (PDT)

Bukanator

Left a comment at Talk:Grant_Steinfeld -- food for thought...

Are you the admin of the pedia? Official designee of The Creators themselves? I can't tell exactly what the heirarchy is.--JayHenry 15:33, 1 October 2006 (PDT)

Cassie

Can we IP Ban the Cassie vandal? Same guy has ruined the page twice.--JayHenry 13:08, 2 October 2006 (PDT)

What's Fair Game?

How closely related to LG15 must a topic be for an article to be allowed in LGpedia?(Free-association can take one very far afield,I hope rules are not too strict but expect to find limits somewhere).

I did a LOT of work on Wikipedia before walking out at the start of this year (partly because those of us who object to registered accounts were made second-class citizens,mostly because my preferences as to the format and scope of two articles I created from nothing in an area where I am an internationally recognized expert were ignored).I'd seen a number of other good people quit in disgust before I did.--L.E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 21:25, 3 October 2006 (PDT)

I would suggest a common sense rule that articles must be presented within the context of the LG15 video series. For example, an article on William Gibson's "Pattern Recognition" and the similarities between this and LG15, would be good. An article on Cyberpunk literature, would not. A link from "Pattern Recognition" to information on Cyberpunk in Wikipedia or another site would be appropriate. An article on Howard Feynman as he pertains to Lonelygirl15 would be appropriate. An in-depth article on Feynman's work with the Manhattan project would be too much. I think this is an adequate rule. But perhaps you're thinking of articles that don't fit into that context, L.E.?--JayHenry 10:54, 4 October 2006 (PDT)

What Jay said. :) - Dharmabum420 13:34, 4 October 2006 (PDT)

Ummm...the physicist was RICHARD Feynman...anyhow,I think it's good to have some background articles on occult matters and surrounding culture so that people have a context in which to place things of that nature alluded to in the videos.--L.E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 15:42, 4 October 2006 (PDT)

Definitely, I just don't expect the depth of such articles to be as deep as they are on a place like Wikipedia... but on the other hand, if they evolved to that depth without the incorporation of copywrighted material, I sure wouldn't stop it. - Dharmabum420 15:57, 4 October 2006 (PDT)

Wow, that's bad. I confused Richard Feynman and Howard Fineman. Can you tell I live in Washington? To summarize -- Howard Fineman, not okay. Richard Feynman, okay.JayHenry 16:13, 4 October 2006 (PDT)

Anyway...since the definition of "fair game" is not broad enough to encompass the Qabala Boat Song,my participation in LGpedia concludes with the posting of this comment.--Louis E./le@put.com/12.144.5.2 16:30, 6 October 2006 (PDT)

Louis, seeing as you are willing to throw away any involvement with LG15 just because your little Qabala Boat Song didn't get included (how ridiculous does this sound reading it now!), I don't think we're losing much with you concluding your contributions here. 71.224.243.78 18:47, 6 October 2006 (PDT)

Thanks!

Thanks for creating the template for us to use! Although, obviously, all the credit for the style goes to you, since I just used the layout from the Main Page. ;) RavensGrace 06:41, 5 October 2006 (PDT)

YouTube tags

Hi Dharma. Brucker and I weren't sure what was best to do with all the YouTube tags. I'd suggested having all the tags that were pretty clearly meaningless (silly lame girl dork, etc.) direct to a single page instead of individual pages for each one. If it turns out that "lame" becomes a clue, we could add a link at that point. But what do you think? It's going to take a fair amount of rote work either way, so figured we ought to pick a way and decide.--JayHenry 17:42, 9 October 2006 (PDT)

I created a category, which seems the reasonable thing to do, but maybe I'm overzealous?--Brucker 18:18, 9 October 2006 (PDT)

template

Hi I thought we could use this template for the admins on here do you like it?

This user is an administrator on lonelygirl15 pedia.