Difference between revisions of "User talk:Modelmotion"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
:Please state your reason for why it should be deleted, or better still make a suggestion of how the page could be made better to accomodate objections.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 13:04, 1 December 2006 (CST)
 
:Please state your reason for why it should be deleted, or better still make a suggestion of how the page could be made better to accomodate objections.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 13:04, 1 December 2006 (CST)
  
I belive That I dont have Much Info on the Subjects Intill Farther Information can be made, i suggest that we lock it from editing or find information..Some people will take it as a insult to there religion other may take it as information...to be honest it double ways, its really hard to choose what to do..--[[User:Iris2009|Iris2009]]
+
I belive That It dont have Much Info on the Subjects. Intill Farther Information can be made, i suggest that we lock it from editing or find information..Some people will take it as a insult to there religion other may take it as information...to be honest it double ways, its really hard to choose what to do..--[[User:Iris2009|Iris2009]]

Revision as of 19:08, 1 December 2006

I agree with Tannhaus. Modelmotion -- this is not modelmotionpedia -- this is LGpedia. It is a community effort. Yet whenever anyone wants to change anything you've edited, you go ballistic. You resort to all sorts of ad hominem attacks and basically just complain until you get your way. This is extremely inappropriate behavior for the LGpedia. Modelmotion, you have been asked to be kinder to fellow LGpedians, and yet you refuse and continue to hurl insults to people who suggest changes. Tannhaus has the right to nominate an article for deletion -- so do you or any other registered user of the LGpedia. When somebody thinks something should be deleted we should discuss it as a community. But instead of mature discussion, all we have is you leveling personal attacks at people. I'm really frustrated with your bullying behavior. Tannhaus is a new user to the LGpedia, he's trying to join our community and you're trying to run him out of town.--JayHenry 11:15, 1 December 2006 (CST)
In response to your question about nomination for deletion, as JayHenry said, anyone can do it to any page, simply by using the template. Nominating a page for deletion does not mean it will be deleted, only that someone thinks it ought to go, and perhaps there should be discussion on the matter. If someone niminates a page you like, then defend its inclusion on the talk page, and we'll discuss it. As an admin, I have the right to delete pages, but I personally only delete one that has been marked for deletion at least 24 hours and has either received no complaints about the marking, or shows a clear consensus for deletion. I'll look into what has been marked later today and put in my two cents. --Brucker 12:34, 1 December 2006 (CST)

Tannhaus is not new as he himself states he has made numerous anonymous contributions: [1] and that information comes from his user page. I first ran into him when he was upset that Thelmites were being insulted by the implication that Thelema was involved. To help him get his message out I made numerous changes on the Bree's' religion pages and with his permission I posted his email exchange with the Creators to support the fact that Bree's religion is fictional. He is obviously very knowledgeable about Thelema but the point I am trying to make is that there has been previous fictional information that draws from the occult and may very well point to directions the LG story line could take. I have no objection to it being made clear that they are fictional and i have state that. What I do want is a fair open discussion of the LGpedia of the topics concerned. I feel that i am entitled to my opinion just like he is. Some of the contributions i have made come from the comments section or other fans who feed me information because they know I contribute to LGpedia. Some comes from my own research. But I stand by my contributions and am totally open to them being edited so that they are fair and representative articles.--modelmotion 12:43, 1 December 2006 (CST)

By the way, your snipe at me about modelmionpedia is just uncalled for. Now that IS an insult. I exercise my free will and I happen to contribute a lot. I fought to save the location section and then i have worked hard to make it a better section of LGpedia. I have contributed a lot to the religion section and I want to see it grow into an informative and accurate resource for information surrounding thes story line. If you look at the edit histories you will see that I have yielded a lot to him and tried to accommdate his objectiions while trying to maintain the relevance of the information. However his general approach is to chop out sections and even entire pages a write them the way he wants them. Now he has achieved that he wants to delete them because they are not relevant to LG. I don't think thats fair.--modelmotion 12:43, 1 December 2006 (CST)

You can respond on your page or my own. If you respond on my page, I see the response faster, but that's the only difference. As for deletions, we have no official policy, but usually we've unofficially been doing what they do at wikipedia. Articles are nominated for deletion, there is discussion, and since we are a community, if most of the people in the community agree, I believe we should all respect the wishes of the community, even if I or someone else individually disagrees.--JayHenry 12:58, 1 December 2006 (CST)


I Agree That It Should Be Deleted..--Iris2009

Please state your reason for why it should be deleted, or better still make a suggestion of how the page could be made better to accomodate objections.--modelmotion 13:04, 1 December 2006 (CST)

I belive That It dont have Much Info on the Subjects. Intill Farther Information can be made, i suggest that we lock it from editing or find information..Some people will take it as a insult to there religion other may take it as information...to be honest it double ways, its really hard to choose what to do..--Iris2009