Difference between revisions of "User talk:Modelmotion"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(The Deacons (commenter))
(OpAphid)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
:I agree with Tannhaus.  Modelmotion -- this is not modelmotionpedia -- this is LGpedia.  It is a community effort.  Yet whenever anyone wants to change anything you've edited, you go ballistic.  You resort to all sorts of ad hominem attacks and basically just complain until you get your way.  This is extremely inappropriate behavior for the LGpedia.  Modelmotion, you have been asked to be kinder to fellow LGpedians, and yet you refuse and continue to hurl insults to people who suggest changes.  Tannhaus has the right to nominate an article for deletion -- so do you or any other registered user of the LGpedia.  When somebody thinks something should be deleted we ''should'' discuss it as a community.  But instead of mature discussion, all we have is you leveling personal attacks at people.  I'm really frustrated with your bullying behavior.  Tannhaus is a new user to the LGpedia, he's trying to join our community and you're trying to run him out of town.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 11:15, 1 December 2006 (CST)
+
== OpAphid ==
::In response to your question about nomination for deletion, as JayHenry said, anyone can do it to any page, simply by using the template. Nominating a page for deletion does not mean it will be deleted, only that someone thinks it ought to go, and perhaps there should be discussion on the matter. If someone niminates a page you like, then defend its inclusion on the talk page, and we'll discuss it. As an admin, I have the right to delete pages, but I personally only delete one that has been marked for deletion at least 24 hours and has either received no complaints about the marking, or shows a clear consensus for deletion. I'll look into what has been marked later today and put in my two cents. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 12:34, 1 December 2006 (CST)
+
  
Tannhaus is not new as he himself states he has made numerous anonymous contributions: [http://www.lonelygirl15.com/lgpedia/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=72.200.30.170] and that information comes from his user page.  I first ran into him when he was upset that Thelmites were being insulted by the implication that Thelema was involved.  To help him get his message out I made numerous changes on the Bree's' religion pages and with his permission I posted his email exchange with the Creators to support the fact that Bree's religion is fictional.  He is obviously very knowledgeable about Thelema but the point I am trying to make is that there has been previous fictional information that draws from the occult and may very well point to directions the LG story line could take.  I have no objection to it being made clear that they are fictional and i have state that. What I do want is a fair open discussion of the LGpedia of the topics concerned.  I feel that i am entitled to my opinion just like he is.  Some of the contributions i have made come from the comments section or other fans who feed me information because they know I contribute to LGpedia.  Some comes from my own research.  But I stand by my contributions and am totally open to them being edited so that they are fair and representative articles.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 12:43, 1 December 2006 (CST)
+
I get what you're saying with the Portal and AphidPedia stuff, I'll do that. I just thought Portal:OpAphid ARG would be a better name for it. I'll fix the links and stuff. But as for a part of OpAphid not being a part of the Resistance - The term "the Resistance" doesn't just include the TAAG, K-Team, HoN, etc. The Resistance is a worldwide organization that encompasses all of those plus anyone else that's fighting the Order - which Op now is doing. So, technically, OpAphid is in the Resistance. And saying that she has nothing to do with the LG15 Universe isn't true either, Redearth88 may not be canon but it's still in the LG15 Universe as an extended fanfic (and yes I know it's not canon). Thanks:) <span style="background:DarkSlateGray">[[User:Kevin|<font color="white">&nbsp;&nbsp;'''•Kevin•'''&nbsp;&nbsp;</font>]]</span> 18:31, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 
+
:Okay, I see what you're saying. Thanks for clearing that up for me! Especially since I'm going to start working on Op/Redearth88/MA pages a lot more (cleaning up and re-wording stuff mostly). <span style="background:DarkSlateGray">[[User:Kevin|<font color="white">&nbsp;&nbsp;'''•Kevin•'''&nbsp;&nbsp;</font>]]</span> 01:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
By the way, your snipe at me about modelmionpedia is just uncalled for.  Now that IS an insult. I exercise my free will and I happen to contribute a lot.  I fought to save the location section and then i have worked hard to make it a better section of LGpedia. I have contributed a lot to the religion section and I want to see it grow into an informative and accurate resource for information surrounding thes story line.  If you look at the edit histories you will see that I have yielded a lot to him and tried to accommdate his objectiions while trying to maintain the relevance of the information.  However his general approach is to chop out sections and even entire pages a write them the way he wants them.  Now he has achieved that he wants to delete them because they are not relevant to LG.  I don't think thats fair.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 12:43, 1 December 2006 (CST)
+
 
+
:You can respond on your page or my own.  If you respond on my page, I see the response faster, but that's the only difference.  As for deletions, we have no official policy, but usually we've unofficially been doing what they do at wikipedia. Articles are nominated for deletion, there is discussion, and since we are a community, if most of the people in the community agree, I believe we should all respect the wishes of the community, even if I or someone else individually disagrees.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 12:58, 1 December 2006 (CST)
+
 
+
 
+
I Agree That It Should Be Deleted..--[[User:Iris2009|Iris2009]]
+
 
+
:Please state your reason for why it should be deleted, or better still make a suggestion of how the page could be made better to accomodate objections.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 13:04, 1 December 2006 (CST)
+
 
+
I belive That It dont have Much Info on the Subjects. Intill Farther Information can be made, i suggest that we lock it from editing or find information..Some people will take it as a insult to there religion other may take it as information...to be honest it double ways, its really hard to choose what to do..--[[User:Iris2009|Iris2009]]
+
 
+
:The information is constantly changing.  I just added the template for the Bree's religion seciton recently so these pages are now much easier to find.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 13:15, 1 December 2006 (CST)
+
 
+
::You called Tannhaus a fascist and accused him of pushing an agenda.  Do you honestly consider that to be respectful behavior?--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 15:04, 1 December 2006 (CST)
+
 
+
That is simply a lie.  I have never called Tannhaus a fascist. He is pushing an agenda and that is to protect the name and reputation of his religion.  He has stated that driectly to me.  I repect his religion and I am not the person who alluded to it within the LG series.  The Creators themselves appologised for that.  But still this web site contiuse to use use the unicural hexagram and other reference to Thelema. I am also not the person who wrote fiction works that insult his religion. I just posted information on those fictional works on LGpedia because they appear to be relevant to the story line.  If you can document where i called "Tannhaus a fascist" I challenge you to do it!--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 15:22, 1 December 2006 (CST)
+
 
+
:The only thing he's proposed is deleting articles that are completely unrelated to lonelygirl15.  Yes, you never said "Tannhaus is a fascist" but you did say he has an agenda of "stamping out all free debate that he does not agree with."  That's basically calling him fascist -- and besides he never did anything of the sort. Do you honestly not see how this is disrespectful behavior.  He has politely suggested that articles he feels are unrelated to lonelygirl15 be deleted.  Nor has he ever tried to stamp out debate!!  The only thing he has done is disagree with you.  Look, you compared me to the prison guards in the Stanford Prison experiment and accused me of censoring your first amendment rights for the same reason -- because I disagreed about some trivial pages!  You '''''must'''''' start being respectful to other users of the LGpedia.  This is a community effort, and it's not a repression of your "will" everytime someone disagrees with you.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 15:32, 1 December 2006 (CST)
+
 
+
As long as its clear that I did not say "Tannhaus is a fascist".  I simply did not say that.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 15:49, 1 December 2006 (CST)
+
 
+
== The Deacons (commenter) ==
+
 
+
No worries.  Since the edit was made by an anonymous IP, I was suspicious. It just seemed odd to delete that one sentence.  [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 13:31, 2 December 2006 (CST)
+

Latest revision as of 01:31, 21 August 2009

OpAphid

I get what you're saying with the Portal and AphidPedia stuff, I'll do that. I just thought Portal:OpAphid ARG would be a better name for it. I'll fix the links and stuff. But as for a part of OpAphid not being a part of the Resistance - The term "the Resistance" doesn't just include the TAAG, K-Team, HoN, etc. The Resistance is a worldwide organization that encompasses all of those plus anyone else that's fighting the Order - which Op now is doing. So, technically, OpAphid is in the Resistance. And saying that she has nothing to do with the LG15 Universe isn't true either, Redearth88 may not be canon but it's still in the LG15 Universe as an extended fanfic (and yes I know it's not canon). Thanks:)   •Kevin•   18:31, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I see what you're saying. Thanks for clearing that up for me! Especially since I'm going to start working on Op/Redearth88/MA pages a lot more (cleaning up and re-wording stuff mostly).   •Kevin•   01:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)