Difference between revisions of "Talk:GoodGollyItsHolly"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
:I reverted because normative, non-encyclopedic content was added.  I then rewrote the "Is she a real person" section to include a fairer look at the issue.  If that was Holly and she was removing a link to her myspace--my apologies, my purpose wasn't to restore the link.  --[[User:Treefunk|Treefunk]] 20:23, 10 December 2006 (CST)
 
:I reverted because normative, non-encyclopedic content was added.  I then rewrote the "Is she a real person" section to include a fairer look at the issue.  If that was Holly and she was removing a link to her myspace--my apologies, my purpose wasn't to restore the link.  --[[User:Treefunk|Treefunk]] 20:23, 10 December 2006 (CST)
 +
 +
::Yeah, I saw what you reverted.  It was definitely non-encyclopedic.  I sent her a PM about the MySpace page.  If she requests we can simply take it down and I think all will be well.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 20:27, 10 December 2006 (CST)

Revision as of 02:27, 11 December 2006

Looks like we have a bit of a revert war going on here... this appears to be a personal MySpace page that we have linked to. I'm not sure if Holly really invited that sort of private scrutiny into her life. I think perhaps we should contact her at the phorum and see if she's okay with this information. While I don't think people should have total control over their own entries, I see no reason the Wiki should link to her MySpace against her wishes.--JayHenry 20:17, 10 December 2006 (CST)

I reverted because normative, non-encyclopedic content was added. I then rewrote the "Is she a real person" section to include a fairer look at the issue. If that was Holly and she was removing a link to her myspace--my apologies, my purpose wasn't to restore the link. --Treefunk 20:23, 10 December 2006 (CST)
Yeah, I saw what you reverted. It was definitely non-encyclopedic. I sent her a PM about the MySpace page. If she requests we can simply take it down and I think all will be well.--JayHenry 20:27, 10 December 2006 (CST)