Difference between revisions of "User talk:Modelmotion/GuillotineCalamity"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: THIS IS PART OF A ONGOING TRIAL 1. i created an archive of the original page 1. i used a generic template 2. i added the revised summary 3. i added back information that should probably b...)
 
(Procedure applied)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
THIS IS PART OF A ONGOING TRIAL
 
THIS IS PART OF A ONGOING TRIAL
  
1. i created an archive of the original page
+
== Procedure applied ==
1. i used a generic template
+
2. i added the revised summary
+
3. i added back information that should probably be included
+
4. i added a link back to the archived page
+
  
options: the original template was pretty good and that could be added back
+
*1. i created an archive of the original page[http://www.lg15.com/lgpedia/index.php?title=User:Modelmotion/Archive/GuillotineCalamity]
 +
*2. i used a generic template [http://www.lg15.com/lgpedia/index.php?title=Talk:Community_Video_Series]
 +
*3. i added the revised summary [http://www.lg15.com/lgpedia/index.php?title=List_of_UGC_series_not_covered_on_LGPedia]
 +
*4. i added back information that should probably be included
 +
*5. i added a link back to the archived page
 +
 
 +
== Options ==
 +
 +
*a) the original template was pretty good and that could be added back
 +
*b) the generic template can be improved
 +
*c) the "archive link' could be included in the generic template
 +
 
 +
==Feedback==
 +
Not sure where or how to discuss this but you are welcome to throw your 10 cents in here till be work out a better place.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 14:34, 11 August 2008 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 20:36, 11 August 2008

THIS IS PART OF A ONGOING TRIAL

Procedure applied

  • 1. i created an archive of the original page[1]
  • 2. i used a generic template [2]
  • 3. i added the revised summary [3]
  • 4. i added back information that should probably be included
  • 5. i added a link back to the archived page

Options

  • a) the original template was pretty good and that could be added back
  • b) the generic template can be improved
  • c) the "archive link' could be included in the generic template

Feedback

Not sure where or how to discuss this but you are welcome to throw your 10 cents in here till be work out a better place.--modelmotion 14:34, 11 August 2008 (CDT)