Difference between revisions of "Talk:Double talk"
From LGPedia
OwenIsCool (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:My feeling on this hypothesis is that it is as of yet too tenuous. I'll probably just wait until someone comes up with some really revealing and insightful conclusions from this hypothesis before I take the time to research it myself. But if you'd like to put something in, by all means. --[[User:Treefunk|Treefunk]] 20:51, 6 December 2006 (CST) | :My feeling on this hypothesis is that it is as of yet too tenuous. I'll probably just wait until someone comes up with some really revealing and insightful conclusions from this hypothesis before I take the time to research it myself. But if you'd like to put something in, by all means. --[[User:Treefunk|Treefunk]] 20:51, 6 December 2006 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'm going to add in the rose bit from [[Bad Decisions]] since it's also a possibility that [[Gemma]] placed it there as a warning. Feel free to edit if it's not suitable... [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 16:21, 7 December 2006 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 22:21, 7 December 2006
I recall seeing somewhere on the boards that one user was looking into Gemma's nods and shakes of the head as a possible way to decode her vidoes. Shakes head = opposite of what I say, Nod = very important. I can't remember where I saw it, but if you remember it, might be worth mentioning in this article. OwenIsCool 19:14, 6 December 2006 (CST)
- My feeling on this hypothesis is that it is as of yet too tenuous. I'll probably just wait until someone comes up with some really revealing and insightful conclusions from this hypothesis before I take the time to research it myself. But if you'd like to put something in, by all means. --Treefunk 20:51, 6 December 2006 (CST)
I'm going to add in the rose bit from Bad Decisions since it's also a possibility that Gemma placed it there as a warning. Feel free to edit if it's not suitable... OwenIsCool 16:21, 7 December 2006 (CST)
