Difference between revisions of "User talk:Treefunk"
(→Cannon: response to Jay) |
(→Cannon) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:On this note, ModelMotion mentioned that there should be a way to overturn deletions, so that work isn't lost. Does this exist? Or will it in the future? --[[User:Treefunk|Treefunk]] 12:31, 5 December 2006 (CST) | :On this note, ModelMotion mentioned that there should be a way to overturn deletions, so that work isn't lost. Does this exist? Or will it in the future? --[[User:Treefunk|Treefunk]] 12:31, 5 December 2006 (CST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ::Yeah, when a deleted article is restored its history eventually reappears. For some reason, it doesn't return right away. I guess you already figured this out because you restored the cannon page. Sorry again about that!--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 13:15, 5 December 2006 (CST) |
Revision as of 19:15, 5 December 2006
Firing of Yousef
Hey Treefunk,
There's no article per se on the firing rumor/incident. However, you can read about it on Talk:Firing of Yousef. I'm not sure why there is not a formal article about it. The page I gave you is hard to find if you're looking for it. I only happened to stumble across it myself one day when I was just exploring the wiki. Hope this helps.
OwenIsCool 14:23, 2 December 2006 (CST)
- Hey OwenIsCool. I'm going to just go ahead and move the Talk:Firing of Yousef content to Firing of Yousef and see if anyone takes issue. --Treefunk 14:25, 2 December 2006 (CST)
- Uhh, I wouldn't do that unless you have the intention of editing it intensively until it reads like an encyclopedia article... which it definitely doesn't right now. If you don't have a lot of time to devote it, I would simply copy the content over little by little (however much you can edit at the time) so we don't wind up with an unprofessional article page. Also, I wouldn't "move"... that implies deleting the talk page content, which doens't seem fair. OwenIsCool 14:37, 2 December 2006 (CST)
- Sorry for the confusion. I'm not deleting the original content and I am editing it intensively. I'll be done within minutes. --Treefunk 14:39, 2 December 2006 (CST)
I has actually suggested that it become a full article so you have my full support. I think this is an important incident in the history and development of LG. There was originally a linke to the Talk page from Yousef pages but once that was removed the Talk page was difficult to find.--modelmotion 14:46, 2 December 2006 (CST)
- I wasn't implying that you needed anyone's permission to write it. I apologize if it sounded like that. The new page looks really good, btw! OwenIsCool 15:11, 2 December 2006 (CST)
Wow, i am really really really excited. Its goes look great. Great work!--modelmotion 15:17, 2 December 2006 (CST)
Orange slurpee template
omg that's hilarious! OwenIsCool 13:20, 3 December 2006 (CST)
Awesome. --Brucker 13:35, 4 December 2006 (CST)
Theories and Speculation
The theories and speculation pages you've been working on are great! I've never seen a lot of these theories and I'm really enjoying these pages. Keep up the good work!--JayHenry 22:47, 4 December 2006 (CST)
Cannon
Oh, geez, sorry, I just saw it on the list of orphaned pages and didn't even realize it was a joke about people confusing "canon" and "cannon." Please, feel free to recreate. I like it a lot. I've been trying to reduce the amount of orphaned and dead-end pages, but I apologize that I got a little sloppy and deleted a page that existed for a good reason.--JayHenry 12:29, 5 December 2006 (CST)
- On this note, ModelMotion mentioned that there should be a way to overturn deletions, so that work isn't lost. Does this exist? Or will it in the future? --Treefunk 12:31, 5 December 2006 (CST)
- Yeah, when a deleted article is restored its history eventually reappears. For some reason, it doesn't return right away. I guess you already figured this out because you restored the cannon page. Sorry again about that!--JayHenry 13:15, 5 December 2006 (CST)