Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of New Girl Candidates/Sandbox"
From LGPedia
m |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::You have a point. Time to poll other people as to what the title should be! (UGC doesn't work, though, since Jules and Taylor were both C-created...) - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 18:22, 24 March 2008 (CDT) | :::You have a point. Time to poll other people as to what the title should be! (UGC doesn't work, though, since Jules and Taylor were both C-created...) - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 18:22, 24 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
::::Re: my own point up there^. We should probably leave the page name as-is until the first phase of the fanfic revamp is done, at the very least. Moving things around before its structure is cemented is just begging for trouble. - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 18:29, 24 March 2008 (CDT) | ::::Re: my own point up there^. We should probably leave the page name as-is until the first phase of the fanfic revamp is done, at the very least. Moving things around before its structure is cemented is just begging for trouble. - [[User:Shiori|Shiori]] 18:29, 24 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | :::::True. I named it "New Girl UGC" because it had a sense of uniformality (i.e. [[Cassie UGC]]) and because "List of New Girl Candidates" makes it sound like the new girl has yet to be revealed. --[[User:FH14]] April 14, 2008 | ||
Revision as of 17:22, 14 April 2008
|
This talk page contains one or more discussions that have not yet been resolved. Feel free to add your own comment to these discussion(s) or remove this template once the discussion(s) have been resolved. |
I noticed that the List of possible New Girls" page was nominated for deletion, and I thought that instead of getting rid of all that information, there could be a page simular to Cassie UGC for it. Feel free to edit this, but please don't remove large amounts of information from the page, as it took me a good part of the day to construct this :P. Some of the summaries are incomplete, so feel free to add info where you see fit. (The blurbs shouldn't be much longer than what's already in Flowersinmyhat's section). Anyway, Is this a good idea? Or did I just waste a chunk of my time :P --FH14 18:03, 24 March 2008 (EST)
- Nice job! This is actually ridiculously similar to how I was going to put this together, you just beat me to it. :P I do think this should end up remaining on the List of New Girl Candidates page, though. (Only the lower section was supposed to be tagged as to show that it needs clipped/trimmed/whatever.) - Shiori 17:23, 24 March 2008 (CDT)
- Really? I thought "List of New Girl Candidates" was too... (looks in thesaurus) er.. (throws away thesaurus) um... open-ended? I mean, it implies that a canon one hasn't been found yet. But that's just me and my nouroticness (gah! I can't spell today!) --FH14 18:34, 24 March 2008 (EST)
- You have a point. Time to poll other people as to what the title should be! (UGC doesn't work, though, since Jules and Taylor were both C-created...) - Shiori 18:22, 24 March 2008 (CDT)
- Re: my own point up there^. We should probably leave the page name as-is until the first phase of the fanfic revamp is done, at the very least. Moving things around before its structure is cemented is just begging for trouble. - Shiori 18:29, 24 March 2008 (CDT)
- True. I named it "New Girl UGC" because it had a sense of uniformality (i.e. Cassie UGC) and because "List of New Girl Candidates" makes it sound like the new girl has yet to be revealed. --User:FH14 April 14, 2008
- Re: my own point up there^. We should probably leave the page name as-is until the first phase of the fanfic revamp is done, at the very least. Moving things around before its structure is cemented is just begging for trouble. - Shiori 18:29, 24 March 2008 (CDT)
- You have a point. Time to poll other people as to what the title should be! (UGC doesn't work, though, since Jules and Taylor were both C-created...) - Shiori 18:22, 24 March 2008 (CDT)
- Really? I thought "List of New Girl Candidates" was too... (looks in thesaurus) er.. (throws away thesaurus) um... open-ended? I mean, it implies that a canon one hasn't been found yet. But that's just me and my nouroticness (gah! I can't spell today!) --FH14 18:34, 24 March 2008 (EST)
