Difference between revisions of "Talk:AphidPedia/Redesign"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(How is the contrast now?)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
The colors are pretty harsh too. It needs more contrast like the old page has. (also, love those little eyes on the old headers) [[User:Tigerlilylynn|Tigerlilylynn]] 16:44, 18 February 2007 (CST)
 
The colors are pretty harsh too. It needs more contrast like the old page has. (also, love those little eyes on the old headers) [[User:Tigerlilylynn|Tigerlilylynn]] 16:44, 18 February 2007 (CST)
 +
:How is that? (Gotta admit, I forgot the eyes...I did want to include them, but lost the thought while fighting with the table styles.)
 +
:The links are a little hard to read now, but if OwenIsCool helps me with the stylesheet again, that shouldn't been an issue in the final version.
 +
:[[User:Renegade|Renegade]] 17:31, 18 February 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 23:31, 18 February 2007

Op v. Tachyon puzzles

I really like the new look... it's very killer. One improvement that I wanted to have done on the old version is to distinguish (in some way) between the OpAphid puzzles and the Tachyon puzzles. Could be a different font or backgroud, or even using the Tac and Op initials. Or... it might be pointless to do so, I wouldn't know. I don't follow the games that closely, which is why it's not immediately obvious to me who did what drop. Thanks... OwenIsCool 16:07, 18 February 2007 (CST)

Op has only done 2 drops and I'm not sure if having that info on the link is actually value added. It may make the "side" issue more salient and that's been a problem with new players since they expect there to be sides and there aren't any. Tigerlilylynn 16:34, 18 February 2007 (CST)

Uh, I feel kind of stupid asking this... bc clearly I'm behind. But I thought there was Team Tachyon and Team OpAphid... my mistake? What was the point of the USA Today call stuff? If you have a link to a forum thread that explains that or something... that'd be useful. OwenIsCool 16:46, 18 February 2007 (CST)


Colors

The colors are pretty harsh too. It needs more contrast like the old page has. (also, love those little eyes on the old headers) Tigerlilylynn 16:44, 18 February 2007 (CST)

How is that? (Gotta admit, I forgot the eyes...I did want to include them, but lost the thought while fighting with the table styles.)
The links are a little hard to read now, but if OwenIsCool helps me with the stylesheet again, that shouldn't been an issue in the final version.
Renegade 17:31, 18 February 2007 (CST)