Difference between revisions of "Talk:Immant"
(→Immant HAS TO BE canon) |
(→Immant HAS TO BE canon) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:Sounds fair. You see, a lot of this information is from directly from the source, if you see what I mean ;), and that has its pros and cons. On the one hand, it's very complete, but on the other, it tends to take itself very seriously. So I do think it was good that you stepped forward and tweaked the article. Thanks for the good edits! [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 12:12, 20 January 2007 (CST) | :Sounds fair. You see, a lot of this information is from directly from the source, if you see what I mean ;), and that has its pros and cons. On the one hand, it's very complete, but on the other, it tends to take itself very seriously. So I do think it was good that you stepped forward and tweaked the article. Thanks for the good edits! [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 12:12, 20 January 2007 (CST) | ||
| − | == Immant HAS TO BE canon == | + | == Immant HAS TO BE canon =--[[User:Milowent|Milowent]] 14:47, 21 June 2007 (CDT)= |
Take into consideration this. Immant's account was created the same day as [[Bree]]'s was. Even more canon-like: [[Gemma]] first tells us that the name of [[the Order]] is [[the Order]], yet [[Immant]] tells us that it is [[the Order]] long before [[Gemma]] did. Curious much? Did Immant just ''accidentally'' choose the right name? Immant = canon. I know it. I know it. [[User:SilverBULLETx3|silverX3]] 18:18, 23 May 2007 (CDT) | Take into consideration this. Immant's account was created the same day as [[Bree]]'s was. Even more canon-like: [[Gemma]] first tells us that the name of [[the Order]] is [[the Order]], yet [[Immant]] tells us that it is [[the Order]] long before [[Gemma]] did. Curious much? Did Immant just ''accidentally'' choose the right name? Immant = canon. I know it. I know it. [[User:SilverBULLETx3|silverX3]] 18:18, 23 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
:::I'll respond, but I can't really contribute much. I haven't seen very many of Immant's videos, but what you say is compelling. Are you suggesting we add something to the article or are you just pointing something out?--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 19:55, 20 June 2007 (CDT) | :::I'll respond, but I can't really contribute much. I haven't seen very many of Immant's videos, but what you say is compelling. Are you suggesting we add something to the article or are you just pointing something out?--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 19:55, 20 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Didn't immant come out long ago and admit he was fan-fiction? He is a frequent contributor on the forum. --[[User:Milowent|Milowent]] 14:47, 21 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:47, 21 June 2007
Are you sure we should give creedance to Immant possibly being at the ceremony? After all, his site says he's from NY. We have no reason to believe he is in LA or went there just to be seen for half a second in the dark. 71.224.243.78 16:16, 13 October 2006 (PDT)
I think this entry should go under other fanfic. I really don't think he was at the ceremony! Didn't see the NY reference, but the accent is clearly NY. And his webcam is cheap. - Milowent
- we know he wasn't at the ceremony, because a) he said he wasn't and b) we got a better view of the bald guy in on the run. but it was a theory, and it's relevant. i think it should be included - it was after all something that brought him attention.--Skeeta 20:44, 30 November 2006 (CST)
Contents
Changing video links from YouTube to Revver.
I noticed the Immant videos all link to YouTube. Since the creators asked us to have videos linked to Revver whenever possible, I thought it'd be nice to fix that. Unfortunately, I can't quite figure out how to get the URL for them. Silly, I know. Can anyone help?
OwenIsCool 20:50, 1 December 2006 (CST)
Character Name
Although there is some flexibility as to how we do naming, within the official lg15 videos, character pares are listed under the name they refer to themselves rather than their user names. I think this page might need to be moved to Dr. Immant, and this either made into a redirect, or a page about the series rather than the character.--Brucker 12:51, 4 December 2006 (CST)
I think a simple redirect sounds best. Dr. Immant does not need two pages.--JayHenry 12:54, 4 December 2006 (CST)
Tone?
While I like a lot of the information in the section on Traditionalists vs. Reformists, IMHO, the overall tone of it is too "biased" or "in character." Is that just me? I can see that Brucker's done some cleaning of the grammar in that section, but does anyone else think that the language needs a little tweaking to be more encyclopedic? ~ Jbshryne 21:57, 19 January 2007 (CST)
- Sounds fair. You see, a lot of this information is from directly from the source, if you see what I mean ;), and that has its pros and cons. On the one hand, it's very complete, but on the other, it tends to take itself very seriously. So I do think it was good that you stepped forward and tweaked the article. Thanks for the good edits! OwenIsCool 12:12, 20 January 2007 (CST)
= Immant HAS TO BE canon =--Milowent 14:47, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
Take into consideration this. Immant's account was created the same day as Bree's was. Even more canon-like: Gemma first tells us that the name of the Order is the Order, yet Immant tells us that it is the Order long before Gemma did. Curious much? Did Immant just accidentally choose the right name? Immant = canon. I know it. I know it. silverX3 18:18, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
- I hate when I give some plot-essential information and nobody responds. silverX3 15:39, 24 May 2007 (CDT)
- I'll respond, but I can't really contribute much. I haven't seen very many of Immant's videos, but what you say is compelling. Are you suggesting we add something to the article or are you just pointing something out?--Jonpro 19:55, 20 June 2007 (CDT)
- Didn't immant come out long ago and admit he was fan-fiction? He is a frequent contributor on the forum. --Milowent 14:47, 21 June 2007 (CDT)
