Difference between revisions of "Talk:Phases of lonelygirl 5"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
:Maybe this is a time to whip out {{tl|humor}} that JayHenry uploaded a while back. I hate to be obvious when being funny, but as Jay says "maybe we need this template?"--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 10:55, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
 
:Maybe this is a time to whip out {{tl|humor}} that JayHenry uploaded a while back. I hate to be obvious when being funny, but as Jay says "maybe we need this template?"--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 10:55, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
 +
::haha, true! I had forgotten about that.  I think the article regardless needs a little work.  It can still be funny without the repeated references to suicide... I'll see if I can find the old forum post or comment where that first came up.  [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 11:42, 24 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:42, 24 April 2007

Lonelycrack

Three things:

  1. Was the title of this supposed to be "Phases of lonelygirl15"? I thought maybe the "5" was because there were five phases, but there are only four.
  2. I've seen similar attempts to put together lists of the stages of people's feelings towards the show. Perhaps we could try to generalize this list into something that also includes some of the positive feelings we have at certain stages.
  3. This should probably be merged to the Lonelycrack page, even though the connection to these phases has "not yet been proven".

OwenIsCool 16:01, 9 April 2007 (CDT)


Deletion

This page seems to have been abandoned after its creation. As I mentioned above, I think it's mistitled. I don't have any objection to merging it to Lonelycrack, but I think outright deletion is not necessary. It's just a playful fan article (which could nevertheless stand to be rewritten a little better, naturally). OwenIsCool 10:26, 23 April 2007 (CDT)

Maybe this is a time to whip out {{humor}} that JayHenry uploaded a while back. I hate to be obvious when being funny, but as Jay says "maybe we need this template?"--Jonpro 10:55, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
haha, true! I had forgotten about that. I think the article regardless needs a little work. It can still be funny without the repeated references to suicide... I'll see if I can find the old forum post or comment where that first came up. OwenIsCool 11:42, 24 April 2007 (CDT)