Difference between revisions of "User talk:70.158.76.179"
(Removing all content from page) |
Phoenician (Talk | contribs) (please don't blank the page a third time . . . ):) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | As I mentioned earlier this week, if you have a problem with a video caption, suggest your own and mention your reasoning in the summary and/or the video's talk page. it's just unproductive to continually wipe the captions blank. Please don't do this sort of thing again. --[[User:Phoenician|Pheon]] 00:05, 7 March 2008 (CST) | ||
| + | I don't feel that there SHOULD be captions. They're mostly dumb. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Well, you ''are'' entitled to your opinion, and there's nothing wrong with that. However, it is the general consensus that captions are prefered. In fact, if you've visited the site for some time, you may be aware that many LGPedians often discuss and debate ''ad naseum'' on what is the best caption for its respective video (the best example I currently remember would on the talk page of [[Entertaining Myself]]). In my own personal opionion, they add a wonderful element to their respective video, because they usually contain some humor, often citing inside jokes that are infamous with LG15 fans. --[[User:Phoenician|Pheon]] 05:32, 12 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | each to their own, then. and i don't go to the forums often. and i definitely have never visited a "talk page". i don't believe i'll ever enjoy the captions... | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Blanking== | ||
| + | Now, had you registered and had your own userpage, then you may have a ''little'' more say about what content you may or may not like on it. However, talk pages are quite different, whether they are registered or not, as they show previous discussions on past issues that provide precedented decisions and such (makes no sense discussing something that's already been discussed) But repetitive page blanking is considered '''vandalism''', and you ''need to stop.'' However, please appreciate the fact that you've made some good contributions on the LGPedia (despite past squabbles), and have even been willing to discuss your opinion (see that old discussion above? That does count for somthing) on the squabbles you've had - as a result, I see no reason to ban you (even temporarily) yet :) --[[User:Phoenician|Pheon]] 04:40, 14 April 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 09:40, 14 April 2008
As I mentioned earlier this week, if you have a problem with a video caption, suggest your own and mention your reasoning in the summary and/or the video's talk page. it's just unproductive to continually wipe the captions blank. Please don't do this sort of thing again. --Pheon 00:05, 7 March 2008 (CST)
I don't feel that there SHOULD be captions. They're mostly dumb.
- Well, you are entitled to your opinion, and there's nothing wrong with that. However, it is the general consensus that captions are prefered. In fact, if you've visited the site for some time, you may be aware that many LGPedians often discuss and debate ad naseum on what is the best caption for its respective video (the best example I currently remember would on the talk page of Entertaining Myself). In my own personal opionion, they add a wonderful element to their respective video, because they usually contain some humor, often citing inside jokes that are infamous with LG15 fans. --Pheon 05:32, 12 March 2008 (CDT)
each to their own, then. and i don't go to the forums often. and i definitely have never visited a "talk page". i don't believe i'll ever enjoy the captions...
Blanking
Now, had you registered and had your own userpage, then you may have a little more say about what content you may or may not like on it. However, talk pages are quite different, whether they are registered or not, as they show previous discussions on past issues that provide precedented decisions and such (makes no sense discussing something that's already been discussed) But repetitive page blanking is considered vandalism, and you need to stop. However, please appreciate the fact that you've made some good contributions on the LGPedia (despite past squabbles), and have even been willing to discuss your opinion (see that old discussion above? That does count for somthing) on the squabbles you've had - as a result, I see no reason to ban you (even temporarily) yet :) --Pheon 04:40, 14 April 2008 (CDT)
