Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ceremony baby"
From LGPedia
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Ehh... I don't know. Sounds kind of dodgey to me. -A | ::Ehh... I don't know. Sounds kind of dodgey to me. -A | ||
:::Lol, I agree. This does seem REALLY farfetched. However, I'm with Milo in that we should at least wait a bit. See what happens. I mean, the first time we saw a man in a black suit, would we have KNOWN that it was important? Not necessarily. Then... enter [[Watcher]]s. So yeah, personally I say wait for a little bit. We can always delete later if this doesn't pan out. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 00:34, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | :::Lol, I agree. This does seem REALLY farfetched. However, I'm with Milo in that we should at least wait a bit. See what happens. I mean, the first time we saw a man in a black suit, would we have KNOWN that it was important? Not necessarily. Then... enter [[Watcher]]s. So yeah, personally I say wait for a little bit. We can always delete later if this doesn't pan out. --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 00:34, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::I like this page. Who ever said there was anything wrong with crazy theories? One of them is bound to turn out to be true, right? As long as we indicate that this is all (somewhat ludicrous) conjecture, I'm all for it. :)--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 01:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:08, 10 May 2007
I nominate this article for deletion; who says this wasn't a woman who actually lived in the neighborhood and had a child? --Nieriel.Manwathiel
- let's not delete this immediately! let's wait for some input on whether this speculation pans out! --Milowent 00:24, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
- Ehh... I don't know. Sounds kind of dodgey to me. -A
- Lol, I agree. This does seem REALLY farfetched. However, I'm with Milo in that we should at least wait a bit. See what happens. I mean, the first time we saw a man in a black suit, would we have KNOWN that it was important? Not necessarily. Then... enter Watchers. So yeah, personally I say wait for a little bit. We can always delete later if this doesn't pan out. --Zoey 00:34, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
- Ehh... I don't know. Sounds kind of dodgey to me. -A
- I like this page. Who ever said there was anything wrong with crazy theories? One of them is bound to turn out to be true, right? As long as we indicate that this is all (somewhat ludicrous) conjecture, I'm all for it. :)--Jonpro 01:08, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
