Difference between revisions of "Talk:Emma"
From LGPedia
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Inmy observation of the lgpedia. I've decided that all the character pages need a new layout. More informitive and factual, rather than speculatory(if that's a word). It should be based on what we know of the characters, not what we hope to happen or assumptions. I shall start with Emma's page and I hope nobody takes offense, but I'm taking down all the little cute captions under the pictures. Please don't kill me. | Inmy observation of the lgpedia. I've decided that all the character pages need a new layout. More informitive and factual, rather than speculatory(if that's a word). It should be based on what we know of the characters, not what we hope to happen or assumptions. I shall start with Emma's page and I hope nobody takes offense, but I'm taking down all the little cute captions under the pictures. Please don't kill me. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I have no problems with you wiki-fying the Character pages. Any attempts to better the pages are good in my book :) However, I say we should keep the captions. They aren't really ''hurting'' anything... --[[User:Zoey|Zoey]] 21:12, 16 September 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:12, 17 September 2007
Inmy observation of the lgpedia. I've decided that all the character pages need a new layout. More informitive and factual, rather than speculatory(if that's a word). It should be based on what we know of the characters, not what we hope to happen or assumptions. I shall start with Emma's page and I hope nobody takes offense, but I'm taking down all the little cute captions under the pictures. Please don't kill me.
- I have no problems with you wiki-fying the Character pages. Any attempts to better the pages are good in my book :) However, I say we should keep the captions. They aren't really hurting anything... --Zoey 21:12, 16 September 2007 (CDT)
