Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Characters"
From LGPedia
OwenIsCool (Talk | contribs) (yep) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Question about subcategories== | ==Question about subcategories== | ||
| − | If a character is listed in a subcategory (i.e. | + | If a character is listed in a subcategory (i.e. Seen characters), should they also be listed in this category? It seems to me they should be listed only in the most specific category of a hierarchy.--[[User:Jonpro|Jonpro]] 21:52, 16 February 2007 (CST) |
:Roger that. Seen characters are understood to be characters, so no need to mention both. However, the category "Seen Characters" should be categorized with "Category:Characters". This seems to happen with articles as well as with images. Let me know as you find more instances of this and I'll pitch in to set it straight. [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 15:51, 17 February 2007 (CST) | :Roger that. Seen characters are understood to be characters, so no need to mention both. However, the category "Seen Characters" should be categorized with "Category:Characters". This seems to happen with articles as well as with images. Let me know as you find more instances of this and I'll pitch in to set it straight. [[User:OwenIsCool|OwenIsCool]] 15:51, 17 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:16, 26 May 2008
Question about subcategories
If a character is listed in a subcategory (i.e. Seen characters), should they also be listed in this category? It seems to me they should be listed only in the most specific category of a hierarchy.--Jonpro 21:52, 16 February 2007 (CST)
- Roger that. Seen characters are understood to be characters, so no need to mention both. However, the category "Seen Characters" should be categorized with "Category:Characters". This seems to happen with articles as well as with images. Let me know as you find more instances of this and I'll pitch in to set it straight. OwenIsCool 15:51, 17 February 2007 (CST)
