Difference between revisions of "Talk:Xwestsidex's vandalism page"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 27: Line 27:
 
Just adding my support for the fine work that Zoey does here.  I really wish people would just leave her alone.  [[User:ApotheosisAZ|Apo]] 18:53, 3 November 2007 (CDT)
 
Just adding my support for the fine work that Zoey does here.  I really wish people would just leave her alone.  [[User:ApotheosisAZ|Apo]] 18:53, 3 November 2007 (CDT)
  
::Since when did ANYONE on LGPedia hate Zoey? She's an AMAZING admin. And what you are doing is pathetic. I've read about it, and all you come across is as an immature, pathetic person, who really needs to get a hobby. The Creators themselves have said they want to keep the show PG-13, I suggest you try and do that too. Your jokes are old, and your actions are even older. As much as you make edits, there's hundreds of people who are more than happy to revert them. So why don't you go crawl in a corner and leave everyone alone. You're clearly not a fan.
+
::Since when did ANYONE on LGPedia hate Zoey? She's an AMAZING admin. And what you are doing is pathetic. I've read about it, and all you come across is as an immature, pathetic person, who really needs to get a hobby. The Creators themselves have said they want to keep the show PG-13, I suggest you try and do that too. Your jokes are old, and your actions are even older. As much as you make edits, there's hundreds of people who are more than happy to revert them. So why don't you go crawl in a corner and leave everyone alone. You're clearly not a fan.[[User:Babygurl1853|Babygurl1853]] 19:03, 3 November 2007 (CDT)
  
 
:::::First let me say that the notion of "sexual references" within the show is quite interesting.  We already have a relationship page and developing this theme within that architecture might be educational.  If its done well and based on documented evidence from a video then its relevant.  Lets keep our eye on the ball and focus on the facts and stay away from personal attacks and abuse of the pedia.  If we don't we could loose potentially valuable content.  I think Zoey has a tough job to do but if you work with her and the other admins perhaps you can get back to how best to present the information.  If there is a case to be made for  "sexual references"  it should however be made within the context of what was actually in the video and supported by documented references.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 19:01, 3 November 2007 (CDT)
 
:::::First let me say that the notion of "sexual references" within the show is quite interesting.  We already have a relationship page and developing this theme within that architecture might be educational.  If its done well and based on documented evidence from a video then its relevant.  Lets keep our eye on the ball and focus on the facts and stay away from personal attacks and abuse of the pedia.  If we don't we could loose potentially valuable content.  I think Zoey has a tough job to do but if you work with her and the other admins perhaps you can get back to how best to present the information.  If there is a case to be made for  "sexual references"  it should however be made within the context of what was actually in the video and supported by documented references.--[[User:Modelmotion|modelmotion]] 19:01, 3 November 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 00:03, 4 November 2007

Xwestsidex, I want you to know that I respect your right to voice your opinions regarding the LG15 series. There are a number of things in the series that can be construed as sexual references, I do not deny that. However, I don't think that the LGPedia is the right place to voice said opinions. There are plenty of other places you can create transcripts and the likes where you can make references to whatever aspects of the show you see fit. I saw you created that blog the other day, that seems like a good outlet. I just do not believe that LGPedia is the place for this. As such, I have deleted this page, but I will leave the talk page available so there can be further discussion, if need be. Please remember to keep everything respectful, and that is a comment to everyone. Thanks. --Zoey 17:40, 3 November 2007 (CDT)


"I saw you created that blog the other day, that seems like a good outlet"

UR AN IDIOT! I did NOT create that blog, that was a fake xwestsidex

Check xwestsidexxy's IP. NOT ME!


Zoey sad to say, but you just fucked everything up, mkay. I almost had an agreement with Jonpro, and then you had to step in and say "nope! Can't do it! It conflicts with my feminazi beliefs!"

This is why people on LGpedia hate you, Zoey. Because you come in and do stupid shit like this. Ur a hater, Zoey. Ur a bigger hater than Jonpro. I can see through all that professional talk you stated above. It just screams HATER, especially because you knew very well (even by my remarks) that I did not create that blog that was apparently (and humorously) trying to hate on me.

I guess now you'll have to deal with more disrespect and vandalism...and this time, Jonpro's not the target....YOU ARE!

and you'll have to say "Im sorry xwestsidex for hatin on you. Ill let you eat my fish taco" to completely end it...thats all youll have to say....go ahead and say it...come on zoey... just those 14 little words and you can end it.....--xwestsidex

You have multiple IPs, you know. I have no way of knowing for sure which ones are you. You can certainly create a similar blog though, if you want an outlet. You should know that Jonpro is not the boss around here. He is an admin, he was trying to be professional. But when it comes down to it, this is a community site and as a community, we try to keep things appropriate. Jonpro never actually agreed to give you this page, since he doesn't have the right to do that. He's just a good guy, trying to do his job properly. This has nothing to do with "feminazi beliefs," it has to do with respect, which you are clearly not showing in this reply. I gave you a chance. My reply was respectful. However, you threw it away and called it my "fatal mistake." Now, as the head admin, you should know this will not be tolerated. Your fair chance is now kaput. And I'm quite sure I can get the community to back me on this :) --Zoey 18:40, 3 November 2007 (CDT)
Banned users shouldn't be talking in the first place, and everybody around here knows he's just desperately looking for an excuse to justify his pathetic little stunts. As somebody who has already been added to his almighty deathlist of doom, I can tell you it's about as terrible as his dick is long - not at all.
Can we please just stop being nice to him and enforce the ban now?
~ Renegade (talk | contribs) 18:48, 3 November 2007 (CDT)
xwestsidex your sense of humor is banal, lame, and offensive to some - that's why the Creators put a stop to it on the comments page months ago. Stop wasting the time of the good people like Zoey who work so hard to make the LGPedia valuable and intelligent. If you want to carry on like a moron for your own entertainment and anyone like-minded, take her advice. The internet is a big place. Creating a blog takes about 5 minutes on blogger or livejournal or whereever - and I'll bet the staff here would let you post a link to it from an otherwise empty page (perhaps with a disclaimer) so searches on LGPedia would find the link. Just a suggestion. ~ QtheC 18:51, 3 November 2007 (CDT)

Just adding my support for the fine work that Zoey does here. I really wish people would just leave her alone. Apo 18:53, 3 November 2007 (CDT)

Since when did ANYONE on LGPedia hate Zoey? She's an AMAZING admin. And what you are doing is pathetic. I've read about it, and all you come across is as an immature, pathetic person, who really needs to get a hobby. The Creators themselves have said they want to keep the show PG-13, I suggest you try and do that too. Your jokes are old, and your actions are even older. As much as you make edits, there's hundreds of people who are more than happy to revert them. So why don't you go crawl in a corner and leave everyone alone. You're clearly not a fan.Babygurl1853 19:03, 3 November 2007 (CDT)
First let me say that the notion of "sexual references" within the show is quite interesting. We already have a relationship page and developing this theme within that architecture might be educational. If its done well and based on documented evidence from a video then its relevant. Lets keep our eye on the ball and focus on the facts and stay away from personal attacks and abuse of the pedia. If we don't we could loose potentially valuable content. I think Zoey has a tough job to do but if you work with her and the other admins perhaps you can get back to how best to present the information. If there is a case to be made for "sexual references" it should however be made within the context of what was actually in the video and supported by documented references.--modelmotion 19:01, 3 November 2007 (CDT)