Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Blog3"

Revision as of 22:19, 14 April 2007

This article has been nominated for deletion Reason: the template has been deleted so the talk should be too Please discuss this proposal on this article's talk page

looks good, but...

I like the idea of a single template like this, but visually I think it should still have a border. Or maybe a good buffer of white space around it at least. --Brucker 16:08, 31 October 2006 (PST)

Tweak it and see what you can do with it. FYI I took it from the Star Trek Episodes template from the Wikipedia. -- Twjaniak 16:14, 31 October 2006 (PST)

I've given it a border and increased the space between the table and the rest of the text on the page. What do you think now? -- Twjaniak 18:11, 31 October 2006 (PST)

Looks great! --Brucker 09:37, 1 November 2006 (PST)

This template is creating an unnecessary and ugly line-break at the start of articles. I dunno, I personally think it would be cooler if we tried to develop unique looking templates rather than just copying all our style sets off wikipedia.--JayHenry 13:14, 1 November 2006 (PST)

I don't think the line break is there in the template so much as it's the line break before the text of trhe articles. Nonetheless, I sort of like the extra space. See my slight revision to What Makes Us Sad? and tell me if you still don't like it. --Brucker 13:23, 1 November 2006 (PST)

malfunction?

Is it just me, or does the template look wrong to other people? --Brucker 11:43, 14 December 2006 (CST)

It appears to be working in some places, but exploding in others. See: Bree Phone Home for example.--JayHenry 10:56, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Whoops, I missed a small detail, apparently. I think I got it now. --Brucker 11:22, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Blog sorting

Clever, Jay! I like it! --Brucker 17:06, 31 January 2007 (CST)

Production credit categories

Does everyone like the production credit categorization?? It's a little bit time consuming, and if people don't think it's a good idea, I don't want to categorize everything. I think it will be useful to link from the pages of the cast and crew to their complete production credit category tree. Do others agree/like it? Lemme know! --JayHenry 16:37, 20 February 2007 (CST)

I think it's useful, and it sure beats manually updating the credits for everyone each time a new video comes out. I've been looking at your edits, but unfortunately, I can't comprehend any of them (obviously my fault, not yours). It doesn't seem like a high-priority thing, so if you have other stuff to do, I wouldn't pressure you to wrap this up. I don't understand what you mean by "categorizing everything". Doesn't this automate it in a sense? I mean, when you update blog3, doesn't that just automatically categorize all the credits and filmography? OwenIsCool 17:13, 20 February 2007 (CST)

It categorizes everything, but I have to create the subcategories manually. I'm doing it one category at a time, because if it somehow explodes, I want it to be easy to figure out where.--JayHenry 17:20, 20 February 2007 (CST)

But to answer your question. Yes, once this is finished it will automatically update everything.--JayHenry 17:21, 20 February 2007 (CST)