Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Blog3"

From LGPedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(malfunction?)
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
:It appears to be working in some places, but exploding in others.  See: [[Bree Phone Home]] for example.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 10:56, 23 January 2007 (CST)
 
:It appears to be working in some places, but exploding in others.  See: [[Bree Phone Home]] for example.--[[User:JayHenry|JayHenry]] 10:56, 23 January 2007 (CST)
 +
::Whoops, I missed a small detail, apparently. I think I got it now. --[[User:Brucker|Brucker]] 11:22, 23 January 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 17:22, 23 January 2007

looks good, but...

I like the idea of a single template like this, but visually I think it should still have a border. Or maybe a good buffer of white space around it at least. --Brucker 16:08, 31 October 2006 (PST)

Tweak it and see what you can do with it. FYI I took it from the Star Trek Episodes template from the Wikipedia. -- Twjaniak 16:14, 31 October 2006 (PST)
I've given it a border and increased the space between the table and the rest of the text on the page. What do you think now? -- Twjaniak 18:11, 31 October 2006 (PST)
Looks great! --Brucker 09:37, 1 November 2006 (PST)
This template is creating an unnecessary and ugly line-break at the start of articles. I dunno, I personally think it would be cooler if we tried to develop unique looking templates rather than just copying all our style sets off wikipedia.--JayHenry 13:14, 1 November 2006 (PST)
I don't think the line break is there in the template so much as it's the line break before the text of trhe articles. Nonetheless, I sort of like the extra space. See my slight revision to What Makes Us Sad? and tell me if you still don't like it. --Brucker 13:23, 1 November 2006 (PST)

malfunction?

Is it just me, or does the template look wrong to other people? --Brucker 11:43, 14 December 2006 (CST)

It appears to be working in some places, but exploding in others. See: Bree Phone Home for example.--JayHenry 10:56, 23 January 2007 (CST)
Whoops, I missed a small detail, apparently. I think I got it now. --Brucker 11:22, 23 January 2007 (CST)